期刊文献+

大学英语课程动态评估 被引量:4

Dynamic Evaluation of College English Curriculum
下载PDF
导出
摘要 评价是英语课程的重要组成部分,合理有效的多元评价体系是实现课程目标的重要保障,有助于监控教学全过程和结果,了解课程标准的执行情况,改进教学管理,促进英语课程的不断发展与完善,使教师获取有关教学的反馈信息以对教学进行恰当的调整,使学生在学习过程中不断体验进步与成功。动态评估认为学习的互动本质应该延伸到评估过程。评估过程不应是一个人(比如老师)对另一个人(如学生)的单向实施过程,而应是双方都参与的双向互动过程。 Evaluation is a key component in College English teaching. A comprehensive, objective, scientific and accurate evaluation system is of vital importance to the achievement of the course goal. It not only helps teachers obtain feedback, improve the administration of teaching, and ensure teaching quality, but also provides students with an effective means to adjust their learning strategies and methods, and improve their learning efficiency. Based on those two aspects, dynamic evaluation has been introduced which is the extension of interactive nature of language learning involving the participation of both teachers and students in it.
出处 《四川文理学院学报》 2009年第4期106-108,共3页 Sichuan University of Arts and Science Journal
基金 西南大学校级发展基金项目<西南大学大学英语评估体系研究>(项目编号:0709209)成果
关键词 大学英语 课程 评价 college English curriculum evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1李霄翔,杨军.“一条龙”英语课程改革可行性评估及校本改革管理机制研究[J].外语与外语教学,2003(10):14-18. 被引量:12
  • 2吴红梅.课堂教学形成性评价的作用和方法[J].外国中小学教育,2002(4):36-38. 被引量:14
  • 3周卫勇.走向发展性课程评价[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2002..
  • 4Bowers, C. ( 1984 ). The promise of theory: Education and the politics of cultural change. New York: Longman.
  • 5Tyler, R. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • 6Pinar, W. ,Reynolds, W. ,Slatttery.P,. &Tauhman.P. (Eds.) (1995). Understanding curriculurs New York: Peter Lang.
  • 7Madaus, G., Scriven, M., & Stufflebeam, D.(1983). Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human secvice evaluation. Boston, MA: KluwerNijhoff.
  • 8Harris, D. ,C. Bell. (1986) . Evaluating and human service evaluation. Boston, MA: KluwerNijhoff. and assessing for learning. [ M ]. New York: Nichols Publishing Company.
  • 9Harris, D. ,C. Bell. (1986) . Evaluating and human service evaluation. Boston, MA: KluwerNijhoff. and assessing for learning. [M ]. New York: Nichols Publishing Company.
  • 10Genesee, F. ,J. A. Upshur. (2001). Classroom -based evaluation in second language education[ M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

二级参考文献31

  • 1吕中舌.关于“一条龙服务”问题[J].外语教学与研究,1999,31(1):20-21. 被引量:34
  • 2戴炜栋.构建具有中国特色的英语教学“一条龙”体系[J].外语教学与研究,2001,33(5):322-327. 被引量:956
  • 3范文芳.大、中、小学英语教学的“一条龙”规划[J].外语教学与研究,2000,32(6):442-444. 被引量:115
  • 4Lynch, B.K. Language Program Evaluation. Cambridge: CUP, 1996.
  • 5Lueny Morell de Ramirez et al. Outcomes Assessment Results of a MultiInstitutional Curriculum Development Project. Frontiers in Education Conference, 1997.
  • 6Mackay, R. Undertaking ESL/EFL Programme Review for Accountability and Improvement[J]. ELT Journal, 1994,48/2, 142- 149.
  • 7Marchington, M. & Wilkinson, A. Core Personnel and Development.London: CIPD House, 2000.
  • 8Markee, N. The Diffusion of Innovation in Language Teaching.AnnualReview of Applied Linguistics . 1993(13) :229 - 43.
  • 9Ogawa, R. T & White, P. A. School-based Management: an Overview. In Mohrman, S. A., Wohlstetter, P., and Associates,1994:53 - 80.
  • 10Richards, J.C. The Concept of Language Teaching. CUP, 1998.

共引文献85

同被引文献75

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部