期刊文献+

读者的元理解监测为什么不精确? 被引量:8

Which Factors Constrain the Accuracy of Metacomprehension Monitoring?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 精确的元理解监测对随后的元理解控制和阅读理解有重要作用,但是,通常情况下,读者的元理解监测并不精确。回顾20余年的元理解监测研究,发现元理解监测的精确性主要受制于阅读材料特征、监测线索与标准测验特征等因素。未来研究应注意元理解监测的判断形式、监测线索及评价标准对元理解监测精确性的交互关联影响。 Accurate metacomprehension monitoring is crucial to effective metacomprehension control and reading comprehension. However, previous research has showed that metacomprehension monitoring accuracy is far less impressive. Hence, the key issues were addressed in our paper: what factors constrain the accuracy of metacomprehension monitoring. Variables that affected the accuracy of metacomprehension monitoring include that the characters of texts, the orienting activity that may provide cues for the monitoring judgment, and the types of criterion tests. Finally, we made some suggestions and presented new ideas in terms of the research of metacomprehension monitoring accuracy. In particular, we proposed that concordance among monitoring judgment forms, monitoring cues, and criterion test is the key for accurate metacomprehension monitoring.
作者 陈启山 常蕤
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第4期706-713,共8页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30870784)资助
关键词 元理解监测 判断形式 监测线索 标准测验 精确性 metacomprehension monitoring judgment forms monitoring cues criterion test accuracy
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1陈启山.元理解监控的精确性及其延迟关键词效应[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(2):295-300. 被引量:9
  • 2Anderson, M. C. M., & Thiede, K. W. (2008). Why do delayed summaries improve metacomprehension accuracy? Acta Psychologica, 128(1), 110-118.
  • 3Carroll, D. W. (2008). Psychology of language (5th ed.) Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth Chen, Q. S. (2008). Metacomprehension monitoring: Cues, criteria, and accuracy.Unpublished Doetorial Dissertation, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
  • 4Chen, Q. S., & Shiu, L. E (2007, May). Two senses of metacomprehension monitoring. Paper presented at 19th annual convention of the Association for Psychological Science (APS), Washington, DC.
  • 5Dunlosky, J., Baker, J. M. C., Rawson, K. A., & Hertzog, C. (2006). Does aging influence people's metacomprehension? Effects of processing ease on judgments of text learning. Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 390-400.
  • 6Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. (2007). Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), 228-232.
  • 7Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2005). Why does rereading improve metacomprehension accuracy? Evaluating the levels-of-disruption hypothesis for the rereading effect. Discourse Processes, 40 (1), 37-55.
  • 8Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., & Middleton, E. L. (2005). What constrains the accuracy of metacomprehension judgments? Testing the transfer-appropriate-monitoring and accessibility hypotheses. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(4), 551-565.
  • 9Gillstrom, A., & Ronnberg, J. (1995). Comprehension calibration and recall prediction accuracy of texts: Reading skill, reading strategies, and effort. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(4), 545-558.
  • 10Glenberg, A. M., & Epstein, W. (1987). Inexpert calibration of comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 15(1), 84-93.

二级参考文献24

  • 1Thiede K W,Anderson M C M,Therriault D.Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts.Journal of Educational Psychology,2003,95(1):66~73
  • 2Thiede K W,Anderson M C M.Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy.Contemporary Educational Psychology,2003,28(2):129~160
  • 3Fletcher C R,van den Broek P,Arthur E J.A model of narrative comprehension and recall.In B K Britton,A C Graesser (Eds.),Models of understanding text.Mahwah,NJ:Erlbaum,1996.141~164
  • 4Rapp D N,van den Broek P.Dynamic text comprehension:An integrative view of reading.Current Directions in Psychological Science,2005,14(5):276~279
  • 5Thiede K W,Dunlosky J,Griffin T D,Wiley J.Understanding the delayed-keyword effect on metacomprehension accuracy.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,2005,31(6):1267~1280
  • 6Koriat A,Goldsmith M,Pansky A.Toward a psychology of memory accuracy.Annual Review of Psychology,2000,51:483~539
  • 7Dunlosky J,Serra M J,Matvey G,Rawson K A.Second-order judgments about judgments of learning.Journal of General Psychology,2005,132(4):335~346
  • 8Simon D A,Bjork R A.Models of performance in learning multisegment movement tasks:Consequences for acquisition,retention,and judgments of learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Applied,2002,8(4):222~232
  • 9Matlin M W.Cognition (6th ed.).New York:John Wiley & Sons Ltd,2005.191~203
  • 10Nelson T O.A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions.Psychological Bulletin,1984,95(1):109~133

共引文献8

同被引文献219

引证文献8

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部