期刊文献+

自动情绪调节:基于社会文化与神经科学的考量 被引量:10

Automatic Emotion Regulation:Sociocultural and Neuroscientific Considerations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 情绪调节的以往研究大多聚焦于有意情绪调节,而日常生活中普遍存在的自动情绪调节却较少受到关注。与自动加工类似,自动情绪调节无需意识努力、注意分配及有意控制,使个体在阈下知觉中自动有效地调节情绪,根据发生在情绪反应产生之前或之后分为先行聚焦自动情绪调节和反应聚焦自动情绪调节,前者会产生相对适应良性后果,后者则会产生相对适应不良后果,来自神经科学的证据显示两者存在不同的神经基础,这与社会文化考量相一致。社会文化对塑造自动情绪调节起着重要作用,情绪调节的自动认知加工在不断重复的社会文化实践和规范中内化而成。 Most prior research has focused on deliberate forms of emotion regulation but left out an important aspect of emotion regulation, namely, automatic emotion regulation (AER), which is prevalent in our daily life. Similar to automatic processing, automatic emotion regulation works effectively on any aspect of one's emotions without making a conscious decision to do so, without paying attention to the process of regulating one's emotions, and without engaging in deliberate control. Antecedent-focused AER (those mostly taking place before the emotion is fully initiated) seems to be relatively adaptive while response-focused AER (those mostly taking place after an emotion is initiated) seems to be relatively maladaptive. The neural correlates of response-focused AER are different from antecedent-focused AER. The notion of an adaptive type of AER is in line with sociocultural considerations. Sociocultural context plays an important role in shaping AER. Cognitive processing within AER can become automatized with repeated cultural norms and practices.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第4期722-729,共8页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30870777)
关键词 自动情绪调节 文化 神经科学 先行聚焦自动情绪调节 反应聚焦自动情绪调节 automatic emotion regulation cultural neuroscience antecedent-focused AER response-focused AER
  • 相关文献

参考文献47

  • 1Adams, G., & Markus, H. R. (2004). Toward a conception of culture suitable for a social psychology of culture. In M. Schaller, & C. S. Crandall (Eds.), The psychological foundations of culture (pp. 335-360). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • 2Bargh, J. A. (2004). Being here now: Is necessary for human freedom? In J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole, & T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Existential Psychology (pp. 385-397). New York: Guilford Press.
  • 3Bargh, J. A., & Williams, L. E. (2007). The case for nonconscious emotion regulation. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 429-445). New York: Guilford Press.
  • 4Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K., & TrOtschel, R. (2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1014-1027.
  • 5Beer, J. S., Heerey, E. A., Keltner, D., Scabini, D., & Knight, R. T. (2003). The regulatory function of self-conscious emotion: insights from patients with orbitofrontal damage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 594-604.
  • 6Beer, J. S., John, O. P., Scabini, D., & Knight, R. T. (2006). Orbitofrontal cortex and social behavior: Integrating self-monitoring and emotion-cognition interactions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 871-879.
  • 7Bonanno, G. A. (2005). Resilience in the face of potential trauma. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 135-138.
  • 8Carretie, L., Hinojosa, J. A., Mercado, F., & Tapia, M. (2005). Cortical response to subjectively unconscious danger. Neuroimage, 24, 615-623.
  • 9Carstensen, L. L., & Mikels, J. A. (2005). At the intersection of emotion and cognition: Aging and the positivity effect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 117-121.
  • 10Coifman, K. G., Bonanno, G.A., Ray, R. D., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Does repressive coping promote resilience? Affectiveautonomic response discrepancy during bereavement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 745-758.

同被引文献262

引证文献10

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部