期刊文献+

面试预测效度和构想效度研究述评 被引量:10

The Commentary of the Research of the Predictive Validity and Construct Validity of Interview
下载PDF
导出
摘要 面试是人才甄选中最常用的测量工具。大量研究证实,面试的预测效度比较理想,但不同类型面试的预测效度存在差异。虽然能够证实面试的预测效度较好,但对面试的测量构想却知之甚少。研究面试的构想效度,对于提高面试的递增效度有着重要的实践价值。相对人格成分而言,以往研究对面试能够测量到认知成分形成了更加一致地认识。 Interview is the most widely used measurement tool in human resources selection. A large quantity of studies have confirmed that interview had an ideal predictive validity which varied from different types of interview. Though the predictive validity of interview has been confirmed, we still have not much idea about which constructs being measured by interview. It does have some practical value to enhance the incremental validity by studying the construct validity of interview. Compare to measuring the personality components, previous studies on interview had a more coherent understanding of measuring the cognitive components.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第4期870-876,共7页 Advances in Psychological Science
关键词 面试 预测效度 构想效度 递增效度 interview predictive validity construct validity incremental validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1Casio.W.F..Aguinis.H.(2006).人力资源管理中的应用心理学(第六版,吕厚超主译).北京:北京大学出版社.(2005).
  • 2Taylor,P.J.,O’Driscoll,M.P.(2006).结构化面试方法(时勘,陈雪峰,龙建华译).北京:中国轻工业出版社.(1995).
  • 3Arthur, W. Jr., Woehr, D. J., & Maldegen, R. (2000). Convergent and discriminant validity of assessment center dimensions: a conceptual and empirical re-examination of the assessment center construct-related validity paradox. Journal of Management, 26, 813-835.
  • 4Bosshardt, M, J. (1992). Situational interview versus behavioral description interviews: a comparative study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
  • 5Brtek, M. D., & Motowidle, S. J. (2002). Effects of procedure and outcome accountability on interview validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 185-191.
  • 6Berry, C. M., Saeket, P. R., & Landers, R. N. (2007). Revising interview-cognitive ability relationships: attending to specific range restriction mechanism in meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60, 837-874.
  • 7Campion, M. A., Pursell, E. D., & Brown, B. K. (1988). Structured interviewing: raising the psychometric properties of the employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 41, 25-41.
  • 8Campion, M. A., Palmer, D. K., & Campion, J. E. (1997). A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 50, 655-702.
  • 9Conway, J. M., & Peneno, G. M. (1999). Comparing structured interview question types: construct validity and applicant reactions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 485-506.
  • 10Cortina, J. M., Goldstein, N. B., Payne, S. C., Davison, H. K., & Gilliland, S. W. (2000). The incremental validity of interview scores over and above cognitive ability and conscientiousness scores. Personnel Psychology, 53, 325-351.

同被引文献178

引证文献10

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部