摘要
对拟成果购买制与国家社科基金和教育部人文社会科学研究中的后期资助项目进行了比较分析。认为:成果制与两类后期资助项目在设立的目的、资助的依据、在各自体系中的地位、成果的产品属性、资助前的立项主体等方面具有相似性;在资助对象的范围、科研管理模式、资助方管理层级数、有无推荐环节、资助经费的性质及经费管理等方面存在较大差异。在比较分析的基础上,提出了完善后期资助项目和成果制的几点建议。
The article aims at the comparative analysis between the quasi-purchase system of research output and the post-funded projects of the National Social Science Fund and the Humanities and Social Sciences Research of the Ministry of Education. It is considered that there are some similarities in the purpose of the establishment, financing basis, the position in their respective systems, the characteristics of research outputs,establishing subjects before financing and so on; And there are many differences in the scopes of supporting objects, the models of R＆D management, numbers of supporters＇ management levels, whether there has recommendation process or not, the features and managements of the financing and so on. On the basis of comparative analysis, some suggestions are brought forth to modify the post-funded project and the system of research output.
出处
《科学学与科学技术管理》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第7期42-48,共7页
Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基金
国家自然科学基金项目"公共产品类科研的资金投入的拟成果购买制研究"(70373035)
关键词
拟成果购买制
成果制
后申报成果制
后期资助项目
科技投入体制
quasi-purchase system of research output
system of research output
post-application system of research output
post-funded project
S＆T input system
