摘要
无论是"自涉"还是"非自涉",只有它们产生假(或矛盾)句时才应被禁止;一个论题是否称为"悖论",要看它的"严肃性(牵动重大、举足轻重)"或"论争性(扑朔迷离、悬疑难决)"而定。这个广义"悖论"属下可有多个狭义。这样,我们首先抛开"自涉"、"悖论"而把"谎者"论题极度简化为"矛盾"论题并消解,最终表明了西方解悖雄师"尽墨"!
No- matter it is ＂self- reference＂ or ＂non- self- reference＂, only when it generates falsity（Or contradiction ）, should it be restricted. Whether a problem is ＂paradoxical＂ or not depends on its seriousness and controversy. Under this general definition, there are specific definitions. Thus, we first neglect ＂self-reference＂ and ＂paradox＂, and simplify the ＂liar problem＂ extremely into the ＂contradiction problem＂ and resolve it. This proves that the great army of Liar Problem Resolution in the West with a history of more than two thousand years is completely defeated.
