期刊文献+

美国劳动法上雇用自由原则的公共政策例外:形成、实践与反思 被引量:3

The Public Policy Exception to the Employment-At-Will Doctrine under American Labor Law:Formation,Practice and Reflection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 公共政策例外是美国各州法院司法实务中形成的普通法例外,它构成了对美国传统劳动法上雇用自由原则的限制。该例外的适用,为那些因拒绝从事违反公共政策行为而遭解雇的员工提供了侵权法上的诉因。由于法院在适用该例外时对公共政策的涵义和法源存在不同认识,因而导致司法判决的不统一,对全面保护劳动者权益造成不利影响。为了改变这种状况,应当通过对法律的明文规定探求公共政策的法源,并在此基础上扩大公共政策例外在不当解雇案件中的适用。 Public policy exception is an exception in common law which was created by American state courts in judicial practices, and it constrains the application of the employment-at-will doctrine in traditional labor law. The application of this exception has provided the cause of action in tort to the employees who were discharged for the reasons contravening public policy. Because of the difficulty in defining the concept and sources of public policy, the judicial practices between state courts are inconsistent and the protection provided to employees is incomplete. In order to reverse this tide, we can define the source of public policy in clearly legal provisions and broaden the application of this exception in cases concerning unjust dismissal.
作者 胡立峰
机构地区 厦门大学法学院
出处 《西南政法大学学报》 2009年第3期65-77,共13页 Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词 雇用自由原则 公共政策例外 不当解雇 employment-at-will doctrine public policy exception unfair dismissal
  • 相关文献

参考文献41

  • 1Lindsay B. Jackson. A Lesson from Germany on How the United States Could Reform Its Laws on Dismissal [J]. 4 The Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy 522 , 2006:525.
  • 2J. Wilson Parker. At- Will Employment and the Common Law: A Modest Proposal to De - Marginalize Employment Law [ J]. 81 Iowa Law Review 347,1995 : 347 - 350.
  • 3Robert Braucher. Freedom of Contract and the Sec- ond Restatement [ J ]. 78 Yale Law Journal 599,1969:601.
  • 4Arthur S. Leonard. A New Common Law of Employment Termination [ J ]. 66 North Carolina Law Review 631, 1988:641.
  • 5Cathyrn C. Dakin. Protecting Attorneys Against Wrongful Discharge : Extension of the Public Policy Exception [ J]. 44 Case Western Reserve Law Review 1043,1995 : 1048 - 1049.
  • 6王解静.解雇权滥用探析[J].重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2007,24(2):83-87. 被引量:3
  • 7Bob Hepple. European Rules for Dismissal Law? [J]. 118 Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 204, 1997:204.
  • 8程延园.英美解雇制度比较分析——兼论解雇中的法律和经济问题[J].中国人民大学学报,2003,17(2):130-135. 被引量:18
  • 9Melanie Robin Galberry. Employers Beware : South Carolina's Public Policy Exception to the At -Will Employment Doctrine is Likely to Keep Expanding [ J]. 51 South Carolina Law Review 406, 2000:406.
  • 10Dawn S. Perry. Deterring Egregious Violations of Public Policy: A Proposed Amendment to the Model Employment Termination Act [ J ]. 67 Washington Law Review 915, 1992:920.

二级参考文献18

  • 1王全兴.社会法学的双重关注:社会与经济[J].法商研究,2005,22(1):15-18. 被引量:29
  • 2韩桂君.修改《劳动法》若干问题研究——从基本理念和具体制度层面分析[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2005(3):38-45. 被引量:12
  • 3肖明辉.劳动权的宪政经济学思考[J].四川师范大学学报(社会科学版),2005,32(5):50-54. 被引量:1
  • 4孙天全.权利滥用概念解析[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2005,7(5):29-31. 被引量:1
  • 5J. Addison. Job Security in the United States: Law,Collective Bargaining, Policy, and Practice[J]. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 24(3), 381 - 418.
  • 6Gerrit de Geest. Law and Economics and the Labor Market[M]. New Horizons in Law and Eeonomics, 1999.
  • 7ACAS Publications. Advisory Conciliation and Arbitration Service (1995), Annual Report[Z]. Leicester.
  • 8John Godard. Industrial Relations, the Eeonomy,and Society[ M ]. 2^nd edition, Captus Press Inc. , Yark University of Campus, 2000.13-15.
  • 9G. Akerlof, L. Katz. Do Deferred Wages Dominate Involuntary Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device? [Z].Cambridge:National Bureau of Economic Research, ,Working Paper, 2025.
  • 10J. Addison. The absence of job protection legislation:a sourcef competitive advantage for the United States[A]. Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Growth[C]. Washington:JAl Press,1989.

共引文献132

同被引文献16

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部