期刊文献+

丙泊酚复合瑞米芬太尼用于门诊无痛胃镜检查的临床观察 被引量:4

Clinical observation on the application of combination of propofol-remifentani in painless gastroscopy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨丙泊酚复合瑞米芬太尼用于门诊无痛胃镜的安全性和有效性。方法ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级要求行门诊无痛胃镜检查的患者200例,随机分为2组,即丙泊酚瑞米芬太尼组(PR组)和丙泊酚组(P组),每组100例。P组以1.5~2.5mg/kg异丙酚推注,PR组以1~1.5mg/kg异丙酚推注,复合瑞芬太尼0.15μg/(kg.min)泵入,待其睫毛反射消失后开始进行胃镜检查。记录药物的总用药量、意识恢复和定向力恢复时间、术中呼吸抑制及体动等不良反应的发生率。结果两组患者术中的体动及呼吸抑制差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且PR组丙泊酚用量明显少于P组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论丙泊酚复合小剂量瑞米芬太尼不但可以减少丙泊酚用量,而且能有效降低呼吸抑制、体动等副反应。 Objective To evaluate efficacy and safety of combination of propofol-remifentani in painless gastroscopy. Methods 200 patients with grade of ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ undergoing gastroscopy were divided randomly into group PR ( n = 100) and group P ( n = 100). Patients in group P were infused propefol 1.5 - 2.5mg/kg intravenously; patients in group PR were infused propofoll - 1.5mg/kg intravenously and pumped remifentani 0.15μg/( kg·min). Gastroscopy was inserted after eyelashes reflex had been extinct. Total dose of propofol, recovering time of consciousness and orientation, and occurrence of body movement and respiratory depression were observed and recorded. Results There was significant difference in respiratory depression and body movement during operation between the two groups (P 〈 0.05). The dosage of drug used in group P was obviously more than that in group PR(P 〈0, 05). Conclusions The combination of propofol with remifentani applied to the operation of gastroscopy can provide satisfactory anesthesia effects with advantage of lower dose of propofol, less respiratory depression and less body movement.
作者 贺丙华 姜英
出处 《微创医学》 2009年第3期235-236,共2页 Journal of Minimally Invasive Medicine
关键词 无痛胃镜 丙泊酚 瑞芬太尼 Painless gastroscopy Propofol Remifentani
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献13

  • 1郑清民,李师阳,肖全胜,姚伟瑜,房小斌.雷米芬太尼和丙泊酚复合麻醉用于人工流产的观察[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(1):64-64. 被引量:22
  • 2李雪梅,赵淑苹.无痛性胃镜与普通胃镜检查并发贲门撕裂的临床观察[J].贵州医药,2005,29(10):944-945. 被引量:21
  • 3徐志勇,王晓,李杰,思永玉,刘进.雷米芬太尼在无痛胃镜中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(2):137-138. 被引量:30
  • 4陈德坚,陈剑锋,陈磊.丙泊酚联合舒芬太尼或瑞芬太尼用于老年人纤维结肠镜检查的临床观察[J].中国老年学杂志,2006,26(7):906-907. 被引量:37
  • 5Stewart JT,Warren FW,Maddox FC,et al.The stability of remifentanil hydrochloride and propofol in polypropylene syringes and polyvinylchloride bags at 22-24℃.Anesth Analg,2000,90:1450-1451.
  • 6Hindmarch I.Psychomotor function and psychoactive drugs.Br J Clin Pharmacol,1980,10:189-209.
  • 7Joo HS,Perks WJ,Kataoka MT,et al.A comparison of patient-controlled sedation using either remifentanil or remifentanilpropofol for shock wave lithotripsy.Anesth Analg,2001,93:1227-1232.
  • 8Davis PJ,Finkel JC,Orr RJ,et al.A randomized,double-blinded study of remifentanil versus fentanyl for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy surgery in pediatric ambulatory surgical patients.Anesth Analg,2000,90:863-871.
  • 9Joo HS,Perks WJ,Kataoka MT,et al.A comparison of patientcontrolled sedation using either remifentanil or remifentanil propofol for shock wave lithotripsy.Anesth Analg,2001,93:1227-1232.
  • 10Stewart JT,Warren FW,Maddox FC,et al.The stability of remifentanil hydrochloride and propofol mixtures in polypropylene syringes and polyvinylchloride bags at 22 24℃.Anesth Analg,2000,90:1450-1451.

共引文献95

同被引文献22

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部