期刊文献+

子宫切除术后舒芬太尼病人自控-靶控镇痛的安全性和有效性 被引量:11

Efficacy and safety of patient-controlled analgesia with target controlled sufentanil infusion after abdominal total hysterectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价子宫切除术后舒芬太尼病人自控-靶控镇痛(PCA—TCI)的安全性和有效性。方法择期经腹子宫切除术病人60例,ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级,年龄20~59岁,体重45~75k,术毕采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS评分)评价疼痛程度,随机分为3组(n=20),Ⅰ组VAS评分=0时进行PCA—TCI,初始血浆靶浓度为0.08μg/L;Ⅱ组VAS评分≥2分时进行PCA—TCI,初始血浆靶浓度为0.08μg/L;Ⅲ组VAS评分≥2分时进行PCA—TCI,初始血浆靶浓度为0.1μg/L;PCA锁定时间为6min。于PCA—TCI启动前即刻(T0)和启动后1h(T1)、2h(T2)、4h(T3)、8h(T4)、16h(T5)和24h(T6)时,记录平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2)、呼吸频率(RR)、VAS评分和脑电双频谱指数(BIS)。于T1-6时记录总按压次数(D1)和有效按压次数(D2)。记录术后24h内舒芬太尼用量和不良反应发生情况。结果各组各时点HR、MAP、RR和SpO2均在正常范围内,BIS均大于85,组内和组间比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。与T0时比较,Ⅰ组T1-6时VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),Ⅱ组和Ⅲ组T1-6时VAS评分降低(P〈0.05)。与Ⅰ组比较,Ⅱ组T0~2时和Ⅲ组T0,1时VAS评分升高,Ⅱ组术后0—2h时和Ⅲ组术后0~1h时D1和D2升高,Ⅱ组和Ⅲ组术后24h内舒芬太尼用量升高(P〈0.05)。各组病人术后均未见心动过速、心动过缓、低血压、呼吸抑制和镇静过度等的发生。结论子宫切除术后舒芬太尼PCA—TCI是安全、有效的,在术后疼痛尚未出现时进行PCA—TCI,且初始血浆靶浓度为0.08μg/L的镇痛效果更好。 Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with target controlled infusion (TCI) of sufentanil after abdominal total hysterectomy. Methods Sixty ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients aged 20-59 yr weighing 45-75 kg undergoing elective abdominal total hysterectomy were randomly allocated into 3 groups of 20 patients each. The initial target plasma concentration (CP) of sufentanil was set at 0.08 μg/L in group Ⅰ and Ⅱ and at 0.1 μg/L in group Ⅲ. The operation was performed under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with 0.75% bnpivacaine (for spinal) and 2% lidocaine (for epidural). The epidural catheter was removed after operation. TCI of sufentanil was started after operation when the patients felt no pain (VAS = 0) in group Ⅰ and when VAS≥2 in group Ⅱ and Ⅲ . The lockout interval was set at 6 min. If the patients pressed the button once, the target CP increased by 0. 005 μg/L. If the button was pressed 3 times successively within 20 s, the target CP increased by 0.008 μg/L. If the button was not pressed for 80 min, the target CP decreased by 0. 005 μg/L automatically. VAS scores, BIS values, MAP, HR, SpO2 and RR were recorded immediately before (T0) and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24 h (T1-6) after TCI was started. The number of attempts (D1) and successfully delivered doses ( D2 ) was recorded. The total amount of sufentanil administered and side effects were recorded during the 24 h after operation. Results The analgesia was satisfactory in all 3 groups. The VAS scores were 〈 3 and significantly higher in group Ⅱ and Ⅲ than in group Ⅰ. The total amount of sufentanil administered during the 24 h after operation was significantly larger in group Ⅱ and Ⅲ than in group Ⅰ. The D1 and D2 were significantly larger during the 0-2 h after operation in group Ⅱ and Ⅲ than in group Ⅰ . Tachycardia, bradycardia, respiratory depression, hypotension and over-sedation were not observed. Conclusion PCA with TCI of sufentanil is effective and safe for postoperative analgesia. It is better to start PCA-TCI before the patient feels pain after operation with the initial target CP set at 0.08 μg/L.
出处 《中华麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第6期498-501,共4页 Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
基金 广州市医药卫生科技重点项目(2006-ZDi-01)
关键词 舒芬太尼 镇痛 病人控制 药物释放系统 子宫切除术 Sufentanil Analgesia, patient-controlled Drug delivery systems Hysterectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Irwin MC,Campbell RC,Lun TS,et al.Patient maintained alfentanil target-controlled infusion for analgesia during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.Can J Anaesth,1996,43:919-924.
  • 2Van den Nieuwenhuyzen MC,Engbers FH,Burm AC,et al.Target-controlled infusion of alfentanil for postoperative analgesia:a feasibility study and pharmacodynamic evaluation in the early postoperative period.Br J Anaesth,1997,78:17-23.
  • 3Checketts MR,Gilhooly CJ,Kenny GN.Patient-maintained analgesia with target-controlled alfentanil infusion after cardiac surgery:a comparison with morphine PCA.Br J Anaesth,1998,80:748-751.
  • 4Derrode N,Lebrun F,Levron JC,et al.Influence of peroperative opioid on postoperative pain after major abdominal surgery:sufentanil TCI versus remifentanil TCI.A randomized,controlled study.Br J Anaesth,2003,91:842-849.
  • 5郭瑞宏.开胸手术后应用舒芬太尼与芬太尼自控静脉镇痛的临床观察[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2006,12(4):221-223. 被引量:34
  • 6杨宁,左明章.胸腹部手术患者靶控输注舒芬太尼复合异丙酚的药效学[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(11):977-979. 被引量:24
  • 7叶飞,佘守章.舒芬太尼自控-靶控镇痛对腰麻患者呼吸功能和镇静程度的影响[J].中华生物医学工程杂志,2008,14(2):114-118. 被引量:14
  • 8Cepts E,Shafer S,Camu F,et al.Linearity of pharmacokinetics and model estimation of sufentanil.Anesthesiology,1995,83:1194-1204.
  • 9Bastin R,Barvais L,Melot C,et al.Preliminary results of prolonged target controlled infusion of sufentanil adjusted to an effort pain score after cardiac surgery.Acta Anaesthesiol Belg,2005,56:31-36.

二级参考文献10

  • 1孙大金,杭燕南主编.实用麻醉学.第一版.北京:中国医药科技出版社.2001,P96~99.
  • 2Engoren M,Luther G,Fenn-Buderer N.A comparison of fentanyl,sufentanil and renifentanil for fast-track cardiac anesthesia.Anesth Analg,2001,93:859 ~ 864.
  • 3Fragen BJ. Infusions of intravenous anesthetics. In: Fragen B J, ed.Drug infusions in anesthesiology. New York: Raven Press, 1991. 63-84.
  • 4Glass PSA, Jacobs JR, Reves JG. Intravenous drug delivery. In: Miller RD, ed. Anesthesia. 3rd edn. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1990.367-388.
  • 5Hentgen E, Houfani M, Billard V, et al. Propofol-sufentanil anesthesia for thyroid surgery: optimal concentrations for hemodynamic and electroencephalogram stability, and recovery features. Anesth Analg,2002,95 : 597-605.
  • 6Vuyk J, Mertens M J, Olofsen E,et al. Propofol anesthesia and rational opioid selection: determination of optimal EC50-EC95 propofol-opioid concentrations that assure adequate anesthesia and a rapid return of consciousness. Anesthesiology, 1997,87 : 1549-1562.
  • 7Milne SE, Troy A, Irwin MG, et al. Relationship between bispectral index, auditory evoked potential index and effect-site EC50 for propofol at two clinical end-points. Br J Anaesth, 2003,90: 127-131.
  • 8Smith C, McEwan AI, Jhaveri R, et al. The interaction of fentanyl on Cp50 of propofol for loss of consciousness and skin incision.Anesthesiology, 1994, 81: 820-828.
  • 9Glass PSA, Sharer SL, Jacobs JR, et al. Intravenous drug delivery systems. In: Miller RD, ed. Anesthesia. 4th edn, New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1994.389-416.
  • 10Coetzee JF, Glen JB, Wium CA, et al. Pharmacokinetic model selection for target controlled infusions of propofol. Assessment of three parameter sets, Anesthesiology,1995,82: 1328-1345.

共引文献67

同被引文献89

引证文献11

二级引证文献73

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部