摘要
调解广泛应用于解决许多种类的争端,许多争端若无法于谈判或协商的阶段获得满意的解央时,仍可运用调解的方式来解决。在台湾,越来越多的当事人将涉及公共工程的争端提交公共工程委员会进行调解。公共工程委员会的目标之一,在于争端制定解决程序,以解决因公共工程所引起之纠纷。基于此一目的,台湾的"政府采购法"在1998年正式生效以前,公共工程委员会成立了公共工程争议处理委员会,该委员会的任务在于处理因公共工程计划进行招标程序所引起之纠纷、涉及公共工程计划之契约纠纷,以及涉及公共工程计划之其他纠纷。台湾的"政府采购法"在1998年正式生效之后,另行成立了采购申诉审议委员会,取代公共工程争议处理委员会。若招标机关及厂商无法就涉及公共工程计划之契约履行纠纷获得解决,则可将争端提交采购申诉审议委员会进行调解。目前采购申诉审议委员会只能受理超过五千万元新台币(约一百六十六万美元左右)的公共工程采购争议。目前在绝大多数的案件中,争端当事人偏向于提交调解,而不直接提付仲裁。其主要原因有二:第一,调解费用远低于仲裁费用;第二,采购申诉审议委员会进行调解的成效有目共睹。因此本文拟就此一调解程序与成果予以介绍。
IX Conclusion
Capital market is hard to be sublimated and this also can be reflected from the legal workers. No doubt that some of the scholars devoting themselves to study the company law and the securities law are famous experts, but none of them can be called the grate master or cross-century talents. Cause instead of morals, capital market always comes on its avarice and trepidation. In conclusion, the capital market is single, neither has the dual nature nor has the contradictoriness. To judge whether the wave riders of the capital market are successful or not, the only standard is if they would like and are capable of earning money. There are no grate jurists, because of lacking of ideological struggles.
