期刊文献+

TOX方案与FOLFOX4方案治疗晚期胃癌的随机对照临床观察 被引量:1

A randomized clinical study of docetaxel and capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with flurouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察比较TOX方案(多西紫杉醇联合卡培他滨、奥沙利铂)和FOLFOX4方案(氟尿嘧啶/四氢叶酸联合奥沙利铂)治疗晚期胃癌的临床疗效和不良反应,方法:50例晚期胃癌患者随机分成两组,TOX组26例,用多西紫杉醇联合奥沙利铂及卡培他滨化疗,多西紫杉醇35mg/m2,静脉滴注,第1天及第8天;奥沙利铂50mg/m2,静脉滴注,第1天及第8天;卡培他滨750mg/m2,口服,每日2次,第1天至14天;3周为1周期。FOLFOX4组24例,用氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙联合奥沙利铂方案化疗,奥沙利铂85mg/m2,静脉滴注2h,第1天;亚叶酸钙200mg/m2,静滴2h后予氟尿嘧啶400mg/m2,推注,后续600mg/m2,持续静滴22h,第1、2天;每2周重复,4周为1周期。两组均治疗2周期以上,按WHO标准评价客观疗效和不良反应。结果:入组的50例均可评价疗效,TOX组有效率61.5%,中位TTP7.0个月,MST12.8个月,FOLFOX4组有效率50.0%,中位TTP5.8个月,MST10.8个月。不良反应比较,III/IV级恶心呕吐发生率以FOLFOX4组显著(P<0.05),手足综合征以TOX组显著(P<0.05),其余不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义。结论:TOX方案与FOLFOX4方案治疗晚期胃癌疗效确切,不良反应均能耐受。两组比较以TOX方案疗效略高,III-IV级恶心呕吐发生率低,更易耐受。 Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel plus oxaliplatine and capecitabine regimen (TOX) versus fluorouracil/lencovorin (LV5FU2)plus oxaliplatin regimen (FOLFOX4)in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Methods : Fifty cases with advanced gastric cancer were enrolled in this study, randomly divided into TOX group (26 cases) and FOLOX4 group (24 cases). TOX group was treatecl with docetaxel 35mg/m^2 ,ivqtt,d1,8; oxaliplatin 50mg/m^2, ivqtt, d1,8 ; capecitabine 750mg/m^2, po, bid, d1- 14. FOLFOX4 group was treated with oxaliplatin 85mg/m^2, ivqtt, d1 ;LV200mg/m^2, ivqtt ,2hr followed by 5 - FU 400mg/m^2 (bolus) and 5 - FU 600mg/m^2 ( 22hr - continus infusion d1-2 ). TOX regimen was repeated every 3 weeks for one cycle. FOLFOX4 regimen was repeated every 2 weeks,4 weeks for one cycle. All patients received two cycles of chemotherapy at least. The efficacy and toxicity were evaluated according to WHO standard. Results:All 50 eases were evaluable for objective response. The overall response rate was 61.5% (3 CR, 13 PR)in TOX group of 26 cases and 50.0 % (2 CR, 10 PR)in FOLFOX4 group of 24 cases. The median time to proqression (mTFP) was 7.0 months in TOX group and 5.8 months in FOLFLX4 group. The medion survial time (MST) was 12.8 months in TOX group and 10.8 months in FOLFOX4 group. Condusion: Both of the two regimens were feasible, well tolerated and effective in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. TOX regimen is more effective and safer than FOLFOX4 regimen with higher mTTP and lower incidence of grade Ⅲ/Ⅳ nausea and vomiting.
出处 《现代肿瘤医学》 CAS 2009年第7期1312-1315,共4页 Journal of Modern Oncology
关键词 多西紫杉醇 卡培他滨 奥沙利铂 氟尿嘧啶 亚叶酸钙 晚期胃癌 docetaxel eapecitabine oxaliplatin fluorouracil leucovorin advanced gastric cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Sasaki, Maeda Y, Kobayashi T, et al. Standard chemotherapy for gastrointestinal malignancies based on evidence [ J ]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho,2000,27(2) :166 - 176.
  • 2Bang Y J, Knag WK, Knag YK, et al. Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2 is active and well tolerate in patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer: a phase Ⅱ trial[ J ]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2002,32 (7) : 248 - 254.
  • 3Ajani JA. Docetaxel in combination for advanced gastric cancer [ J]. Gastric Cancer,2002,5 ( suppl 1 ) :31 - 34.
  • 4Hailer DG, Misset JL. Docetaxel in advanced gastric cancer [ J ]. Anticancer Drugs ,2002,13 (5) :451 - 460.
  • 5Sakamoto J, Clink, Kondo K, et al. Phase Ⅱ study of a 4 - week capecitabine regimen in advanced or recurrent gastric cancer [ J ]. Aticancer Drugs, 2006,17 (2) :231 - 236.
  • 6Hong YS, Song SY, Lee SI, et al. A phase Ⅱ trail of eapecitabine in previously untreated patients with advanced and/or metastatic gastric cancer[J]. Arm Oncol,2004,15 (9) :1344 -1347.
  • 7De Vita F, Orditura M, Matano E, et al. A phase Ⅱ study of biweekly oxaliplatin plus infusional 5 - fluorouracil and folinic acid ( FOL- FOX -4) as first - line treatment of advanced gastric cancer patients [ J ]. Br J Cancer,2005,92 ( 9 ) : 1644 - 1649.
  • 8Al- Batran SE, Atmaca A, Hegewisch - Becker S, et al. Phase Ⅱ trial of biweekly infusional fluomuracil, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer [ J ]. Clin Oncol, 2004,22 (4) :658 -663.
  • 9肖卫.FOLFOX4方案治疗晚期胃癌的疗效观察[J].现代肿瘤医学,2008,16(2):241-243. 被引量:22
  • 10Grothe W,Hofheinz RD,Mantovani Loeffler L,et al. Phase Ⅱ trial of docetaxel,oxaliplatin and capecitabine (TEX) in patients with metastatic gastric cancer [ J ]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 2006,40 : 51.

二级参考文献28

共引文献35

同被引文献5

  • 1Shirasaka T. Development history and concept of an oral anticancer agent S-1 (TS-1) : its clinical usefulness and future vistas[ J~. Jpn J Clin Onco1,2009,39( 1 ) :2 - 15.
  • 2Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T,et al. S-1 plus cisplatin versus S- 1 alone forfirst=lille treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial) : a pha~e 1~ trial[ J]. Lancet Oncol,2008,9(3) :215 -221.
  • 3Ajani JA, Is the addition of cisplatin to S-1 better than S-1 alone for patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer ~ J ]. Nat Clin Pratt Oneol, 2008,5 ( 9 ) :508 - 509.
  • 4吴芳,张弘纲,冉飞武,张湘茹,石远凯.FOLFOX4方案和DP(O)F方案一线治疗晚期胃癌的疗效分析[J].癌症,2008,27(4):413-417. 被引量:24
  • 5黄海欣,陈绍俊,李桂生.XELOX方案与FOLFOX4方案治疗转移性结直肠癌的临床观察[J].现代肿瘤医学,2009,17(9):1736-1739. 被引量:7

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部