中共黄埔军校支部质疑

Question on CPC Branch in Huangpu Military Academy

党史学界普遍认为中共在黄埔军校建有党的支部,开始称直接支部,后来改为特别支部。这种观点的主要依据,就是署名刘天的《赤黄埔系的形成与没落》一文。而事实上,根据中共三大党章的规定,以及相关史料的披露,在黄埔一期时,中共建立的是5个党小组而不是所谓的直接支部。黄埔一期后,中共黄埔军校党组织仍然采取秘密小组活动的形式,始终没有建立过党的支部,更谈不上存在所谓的中共黄埔特别支部。中共为什么不在黄埔军校建立党的支部?这主要在于中共当时对军事工作的重要性还缺乏足够的认识,因而对在国民革命军中(包括黄埔军校)建立和发展中共党组织作出了严格的限制,只允许在国民革命军中派遣特派员和建立中共党小组,而认为不便于建立党的支部。

The academic circle of the CPC history argued that CPC party branch was built in Huangpu military academy, it was named direct branch and then named special branch. The historical material of this view was based on the article named the foundation and downfall of red Huangpu group, which was written by Tian Liu. In order to accuse and slander CPC and Zhou Enlai, Liu fabricated the called CPC direct branch and special branch in Huangpu military academy. However, according to the third party constitution of CPC and corrective historical materials, CPC didn＇t founded direct branch but 5 party groups during the first term of Huangpu, party organizations still adopt the form of secretly group activity after that. It didn＇t found party branch in Huangpu, so does the called Huangpu special branch. Why CPC didn＇t found party branch in Huangpu？ This mainly because that CPC was failed to pay attention the important of military business, so it imposed restrictions on the foundation and development of CPC organizations in National Revolution Army, the party argued that it was un-convenient to found party branch, only allowed to send special and found CPC party group.