期刊文献+

经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗在低体重患者中的应用

The application of the transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with light weight
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨在低体重患者中经桡动脉行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的有效性和安全性。方法住院行PCI的患者301例,分为低体重组(体重<60kg)126例和非低体重组(体重≥60kg)175例,记录两组手术情况和随访6个月主要不良心脏事件。结果与非低体重组相比,低体重组血管穿刺一次成功率较低(P<0.005),穿刺时间较长(P<0.05)。两组血管穿刺总成功率、手术成功率、手术时间、X线曝光时间、造影剂用量、血管相关并发症发生率和随访6个月时主要不良心脏事件发生率相似,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论在低体重患者中经桡动脉行PCI有效可行,安全性高。 Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of transradial approach for pereutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) in patients with light weight. Methods 301 patients undergoing PCI via radial approach in the hospital were divided into two groups,with 126 cases with light weight( 〈60 kg) in group A and 175 cases with normal weight( ≥60 kg) in group B. The data of operation and major adverse cardiac events(MACE) was recorded and analyzed statistically. Results The achievement ratio of the first punc.ture was lower( P 〈 0.005 ) and the time of puncture was longer( P 〈 0. 05 ) in group A than that of group B. But the total achievement ratio of the puncture and the operation, the time of operation, the time of X-ray exposure, the close of contrast medium, complications and MACE were similar in the two groups ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion PCI via radial approach is effective and safe in treating patients with light weight.
出处 《白求恩军医学院学报》 2009年第4期213-214,共2页 Journal of Bethune Military Medical College
关键词 桡动脉 冠状动脉 介入治疗 低体重 Radial artery Coronary artery Intervention Light weight
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献20

  • 1赵文燕,李英敏,刘尚博,王锋,牛东海,杨敏.脂肪细胞雌激素受体的测定及表达水平的研究[J].河北医药,2004,26(9):716-717. 被引量:3
  • 2杨省利,惠昭岚,蔚虎文,周小燕.经股动脉冠心病介入诊断及治疗中穿刺血管并发症的防治及护理[J].心脏杂志,2004,16(6):585-586. 被引量:16
  • 3Onnor CM,Friesinger C. Aging and the heart, In:Topoi E. Textbook of cardiovascular medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Raven Publishers, 1998. 817-840.
  • 4Sugiura M, Hiraoka K, Ohkawa S. Severity of coronary sclerosis in the aged : a pathological study in 968 consecutive autopsy cases. Jpn Heart J,1996,17(4) :471-478.
  • 5Oeefe JH, Sutton MB, McCallister BD, et al. Coronary angioplasty versus bypass surgery in patients >70 years old matched for ventricular function. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1994,24 (2) :425-430.
  • 6Thompson RC, Holmes DR, Grill DE, et al. Changing outcomes of angioplasty in the elderly. JACC, 1996,27 (1) :8-14.
  • 7Colombo A, Hall P, Nakamura S, et al. Intracoronary stenting without anticoagulation accomplished with intravascular ultrasound guidance. Circulation, 1995,91 (6) : 1676-1688.
  • 8Kiemeneij F, Laarman G J, Odekerken D, et al. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty by the radial brachial and femoral approaches : the assess study. JACC, 1997,29( 6 ) :1269-1275.
  • 9GOLDBERG S L,RENSIO RSINOW R,et al.Learning curve in the use of radial artery as vascular access in the performance of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty[J].Cathet Cardiovas Diagn,1998,44:147-152.
  • 10EL SHIEKH R,BURKET M W,MOUHAFFEL A,et al.US experience of transradial coronary stenting utilizing Palmaz-Shatz stents[J].Cathet Cardiovas Diagn,1997,40:166 -169.

共引文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部