期刊文献+

美国《外国人侵权法令》与跨国公司侵犯人权案介评 被引量:2

Comment on American Alien Tort Statute and MNC's Human Right Infringement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自1993年至今,美国律师依据1789年《美国司法制度条例》的《外国人侵权法令》提起了36个跨国公司侵犯人权案。尽管这些案件大部分被美国法院驳回,但是在国际社会对跨国公司的监督和管制缺失的情况下,"外国人侵权法令"仍被人权组织、学者或律师以及人权受害者视为监管跨国公司一个突破口。通过对依据"外国人侵权法令"所提起的数十起跨国公司案件的分析,可以看出美国司法界对目前滥用"外国人侵权法令"予以限制的趋势。通过对《外国人侵权法令》的介评,可以了解目前在美国炙手可热的法律和热点话题。 Since 1993, American lawyers have brought 36 cases against MNC human rights infringement into litigation based on Alien Tort Law of 1789 America Judiciary Act. Although most of the case were dissolved by U.S. courts, Alien Tort Law was still regarded as a breakthrough to regulating and supervising MNC by human right organizations, scholars , lawyers and victims of human right abuse in the absence of international regulation and surveillance. By focusing on Alien Tort Law, we can sense that American Judiciary field would like to restrict the law herein and we can also get to know hot spot in America.
作者 吴琼
出处 《广西政法管理干部学院学报》 2009年第4期110-114,共5页 Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
基金 上师大科研项目(DQW820)资助
关键词 《外国人侵权法令》 跨国公司 人权 Alien Tort Law MNC Human right
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Midao-Marguerite E.Middaugh.Linking Global Warming to Inuit Human Rights. San Diego Interna-tional Law Journal- . 2006
  • 2Alexandra Reeve.A NewStrategyfor Regulat-ing American Corporations That Commit Human Rights Abus-es Abroad[].The Columbia Business Law Review.2008
  • 3Warren Richey.U.S.High Court Allows A-partheid Claims against Multinationals[]..
  • 4Audrey Koecher.Corporate Accountability For Envi-ronmental Human Rights Abuse in Developing Nations:Mak-ing the case for punitive damages under the Alien Tort Claims Act[].Journal of Transnational Law&Policy.2007
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.International Chamber of Commerce:Supreme Court asked to Stop Abuse of ATS[]..2004
  • 8.U.S.v Smith[].US.1820
  • 9.International Chamber of Commerce:Supreme Court asked to Stop Abuse of ATS[]..2004
  • 10Beth Stephens.Comment,Sosa v.Alvarez-Machain:"The Door is Still Ajar"for Human Rights Litiga-tionin U.S.Courts[].BrookLRev (-).(20042005)

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部