古希腊辩证法的分化及其后果

Differentiation of the ancient Greek dialectics and result

为探究辩证法的缘起和本真意蕴,运用逻辑分析的方法回归古希腊,分析古希腊辩证法的产生和逻辑演进过程。分析表明:源于古希腊的辩证法是在追寻世界的本源问题时产生的,具有本体论的意蕴;它在经历了苏格拉底和柏拉图的完善之后产生了分化,形成了苏格拉底辩证法路向和柏拉图辩证法路向,且二者都面临着在解决"一与多关系"问题上的困境;此后黑格尔继承了柏拉图的路向在思辨领域解决柏拉图的困境,而马克思在出发点上继承了苏格拉底辩证法的路向,并在本体论问题上扬弃了经黑格尔完善的柏拉图辩证法的路向,创立了实践辩证法。

The paper use the logic of regression analysis in ancient Greece to explore the origins of dialectics and the true meaning. By analyzing the emergence of ancient Greek dialectics and logical evolution, it is known that ： the dialectics which is from ancient Greece came from the origin of the world. It is due to the ontology of the world that explores entanglement, and have the implication of ontology. However, the dialectics have a differentiation after Socrates and Plato perfected it：road to the dialectics of Socrates and road to the dialectics of Plato. They face a common dilemma in the relationship between General and the individual. Hegel inherited the road to the dialectics of Plato and tried to settle the plight of Plato in the thinking field while Marx inherited Socrates on the starting point, and abandoned the road to the dialectics of Plato which Hegel had perfected. In this situation, Marx created the practice dialectics.