期刊文献+

创新性学术观点或理论形成的可能途径和方式 被引量:1

Possible ways for the innovative academic ideas or theory formation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为探索创新性学术理论形成的路径,针对学术创新方法研究领域中所存在的过于零散和非系统化的现状,利用现代复杂系统综合方法对学术观点和理论创新的一般途径和方式进行了系统性的分析和研究。分析认为,创造性学术观点或理论的形成是一个随机探索的过程;批判建构式的创新方法是学术创新和理论创新的核心方法;层次越迁式、方法创新式、借它山石式、无人区式、学科交叉式等方法都可以看作是批判建构式方法的具体表现。分析结果表明,创新性学术观点或理论形成的诸多学术创新途径和方式之间存在相互包含、相互补充、相互协同的内在统一性关系,这充分体现了学术创新活动的综合性和复杂性的特征。 For the existence of too fragmented and non-systematic status in the field of the approaches to the academic innovation, the paper carries out a more systematic research, with an integrated approach of the contemporary complex systems, on the general ways and means of the academic of viewspoint and theory of the innovation. The analysis shows that the innovative academic ideas or theory formation is a random process of the exploration. The construction style is the core method for the academic innovation. The transfer-level style, innovative methods, taking advantage of other resources, no-man's zone style, cross-disciplinary style and so on are regarded as the specific exemplifications of the critical construction style. The results show that the inner unified relationship of the mutual involvement, mutual complement and mutual cooperation of the ways and manner of the innovative academic ideas or theory formation fully embody the features of the complexity and the synthesis of the academic innovation activities.
作者 刘燕青
出处 《长安大学学报(社会科学版)》 2009年第2期103-110,共8页 Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 科学研究方法 学术创新 观点和理论 途径和方式 批判建构式 scientific research method academic innovation idea or theory way and manner critical construction style
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1爱因斯坦 英费尔德.物理学的进化[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1962..
  • 2申农.通信的数学理论[M].上海:上海市科学技术编译馆,1965.
  • 3黑格尔.精神现象学:下册[M].贺麟,王玖兴,译.北京:商务印书馆,1979.
  • 4黑格尔.逻辑学:上卷[M].北京:商务印书馆,1966..
  • 5维纳.控制论[M].北京:科学出版社,1963..

共引文献161

同被引文献17

  • 1姜明.以学科交叉为特色的高校核心竞争力研究[J].中国成人教育,2007(15):8-9. 被引量:2
  • 2Clapham M. M. The Convergent Validity of the Tor- rance Tests of Creative Thinking and Creativity Inter- est Inventories[J]. Educational and Psychological Mea- surement,2004, 64(5): 828-841.
  • 3Feist G. J., Barron F.X. Predicting creativity from ear- ly to late adulthood: Intellect, potential, and personali- ty[J]. Journal of Research in Personality,2003, 37(2): 62-88.
  • 4Riax M. N., Ali N. N. Structural Cognition: A Compari- son of Creative and Non-creative Adults[J]. Journal of Personality and Clinical Studies,2002, 18(1-2): 1-8.
  • 5Wagner D.R. Continuity and Discontinuity of Collabo- ration Behaviour since 1800-From a Bibliometric Point of View[J]. Scientometrics, 2001, 52(3): 503-517.
  • 6K Subramanyam. Bibliometric Studies of Research Collabora-tion: A Review[J]. Journal of information Science, 1983, 6(1): 33-38.
  • 7Egghe L.Theory of Collaboration and Collaborative Measures [J].Information Processing & Management, 1991, (27): 177-202.
  • 8Luukonen T.R, J W Tijssen, O Persson. The Measurement of International [J].Scientific Collaboration ,2002,(5):51-55.
  • 9Amidon, D.M. The Challenge of Fifth Generation R&D Re- search[J]. Technology Management, 1996, 39(4) :33-41.
  • 10A L Porter, D E Chubin.An Indicator of Cross-disciplinary Research[J].Scientometrics, 1985,8(3-4) : 161-176.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部