期刊文献+

简体中文版脊柱侧凸研究会22项问卷量表的信度与效度评价 被引量:5

Reliability and validity of simplified Chinese version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价脊柱侧凸研究学会22项问卷表(SRS-22)简体中文版的信度和效度。方法:将简体中文版的SRS-22及相对公认的SF-36量表寄给42例青少年特发性脊柱侧凸术后患者。38例患者(91%)寄回了第1份调查表。这些患者(男7例,女31例)的年龄为(17.8±3.1)岁。38例患者中的35例(92%)寄回了第2份调查表。用Cronbach’sα评价量表信度,组内相关系数评价重测信度。通过因子分析评价量表的结构效度。同期效度通过与SF-36各维度的比较获得,评价指标为Pearson’s相关系数(r)。结果:在4个维度(功能/活动度、疼痛、自我形象/外观、精神健康)的Cronbach’sα系数都大于0.7,治疗满意度维度的Cronbach’sα系数0.44。5个维度的组内相关系数分别为0.94,0.86,0.77,0.74,0.84,显示了良好的重测信度。因子分析产生5个公共因素,与源量表的5个维度相对应。SRS-22与SF-36在5个维度间的相关性极高,9个维度间的相关性高,有相关的维度有26个。结论:SRS-22简体中文版量表拥有良好的信度及同期效度,可用于青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者术后疗效随访评价。 OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity and reliability of adapted simplified Chinese version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. METHODS: The SRS-22, simplified Chinese version, and SF-36 questionnaires were sent to 42 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Of them, 38 patients (91%), 7 boys, 31 girls with an average age of (17.8 ± 3.1) years, sent the first questionnaire back. Of the 38 patients, 35 (92%) sent the second questionnaire back. The questionnaire reliability was evaluated by Cronbach's a, and test-retest reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The structure validity was evaluated by factor analysis. Concurrent validity of the SRS-22 questionnaire was measured by comparing with domains of the SF-36 questionnaire, which was reflected by Pearson correlation coefficient (r). RESULTS: The Cronbach's e values for 4 domains (function/activity, pain, self-image/appearance, and mental-health) were all 〉 0.70, and the Cronbach's a value for satisfaction of management domain was 0.44. The ICC of the SRS-22 questionnaire, 0.94, 0.86, 0.77, 0.74, 0.84, showed a satisfactory reproducibility. Five public factors were obtained by factor analysis compared with the five domains of SRS-22 questionnaire. For the concurrent validity, 5 domains had excellent correlation, 9 had good correlation, and 26 had correlation. CONCLUSION: The adapted simplified Chinese version of the SRS-22 questionnaire has satisfactory reliability and concurrent validity, and might be suitable for post-operative clinical evaluation of Chinese adolescent scoliosis patients.
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第26期5153-5156,共4页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2003;28(1):63-69.
  • 2Monticone M, Carabalona R, Negrini S. Reliability of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire (italian version) in mild adolescent vertebral deformities. Eura Medicophys. 2004; 40(3):191-197.
  • 3Bago J, Climent JM, EyA, et al. The Spanish version of the SRS-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis: transcultural adaptation and reliability analysis. Spine. 2004; 29(15):1676- 1680.
  • 4Alanay A, Cil A, Berk H, et al. Reliability and validity of adapted Turkish Version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Spine. 2005;30(21 ):2464-2468.
  • 5Cheung KM, Senkoylu A, AlanayA, et al. Reliability and concurrent validity of the adapted Chinese version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Spine. 2007;32(10): 1141-1145.
  • 6Li M, Wang CF, He SS, et al. Dier Junyi Daxue Xuebao. 2008; 29(2):203-205.
  • 7李明,王传锋,贺石生,朱晓东.简体中文版脊柱侧凸研究学会22项患者量表的信度和效度[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2008,18(3):212-217. 被引量:36
  • 8Li L, Wang HM, Shen Y. Zhonghua Yufang Yixue Zazhi. 2002; 36(2):109-113.
  • 9李鲁,王红妹,沈毅.SF-36健康调查量表中文版的研制及其性能测试[J].中华预防医学杂志,2002,36(2):109-113. 被引量:2294
  • 10Qin H, Chen JW. Zhongguo xingwei Yixue Kexue. 2006;15(4): 375-376.

二级参考文献36

  • 1郝元涛,孙希凤,方积乾,吴少敏,朱淑明.量表条目筛选的统计学方法研究[J].中国卫生统计,2004,21(4):209-211. 被引量:175
  • 2杨廷忠,阮哈建,李甫中.结构方程模型方法在流行病学研究中的应用[J].中华流行病学杂志,2005,26(4):297-300. 被引量:31
  • 3卢文岱.SAS/PC统计分析软件实用技术[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1996..
  • 4Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al.SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide.Boston: New England Medical Center the Health Institute,1993.1-12.
  • 5Perneger TV, Leplege A, Etter JF,et al.Validation of a French-language version of the MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey(SF-36) in young healthy adults.J Clin Epidemiol, 1995,48:1051-1060.
  • 6Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D.Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines.J Clin Epidemiol, 1993,46:1417-1432.
  • 7Gandek B, Ware JE Jr.Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach.International Quality of Life Assessment.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:953-959.
  • 8顾杏元,金丕焕.直线回归与相关.见: 金丕焕,主编.医用统计方法.上海:上海医科大学出版社,1993.115-119.
  • 9Lam CL, Gandek B, Ren XS, et al.Tests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese(HK) version of the SF-36 Health Survey.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1139-1147.
  • 10Ren XS, Amick B 3rd, Zhou L, et al.Translation and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey in the United States.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1129-1138.

共引文献2706

同被引文献60

引证文献5

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部