期刊文献+

国际森林生态补偿制度创新的比较与借鉴 被引量:30

Comparison and Reference to International Forest Ecological Compensation System Innovation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 系统地介绍和比较了美国、德国和日本在森林生态补偿方面的制度创新活动,并积极借鉴国际经验,针对中国森林生态补偿制度存在补偿责任承担公平性不足、补偿主体过于单一、补偿标准偏低、补偿对象范围不够宽泛、补偿资金溃乏等问题提出解决方案。建议中国政府:重新设计补偿制度,以受益者承担原则打破公共责任原则,确保补偿责任公平分担;以政府补偿为主,以市场补偿为辅,改变补偿主体单一现状;在明确林权的同时,考虑增加对其他国有公益林乃至私有林的补偿;采取成本补偿与机会成本补偿相结合原则,提高补偿标准并实施有差别补偿;通过开征生态税、设立风险准备金、实施碳汇交易和开通生态交易服务市场等,以获得稳定的补偿资金来源。 This paper gives a systematic introduction and comparison to the system innovation activities on forest ecological compensation of USA,Germany and Japan. Then it deals with such problems existing in the forest ecological compensation system of China as following:unfair compensation for lack of responsibility, too single compensation subject, too low compensation standard,too narrow compensation scope, lack of compensation funds. It is recommended that the Chinese Government should draw international experiences actively. It is suggested: (1)to redesign the compensation system to achieve an equitable sharing of liabilities by inducing the principle of beneficiaries and breaking the principle of public responsibility; (2)to change the status of a single compensation subject by making the Government compensation as the main and making the market compensation as the supplement;(3) at the same time of making forest right clear,to consider increasing the number of other state-owned forests as well as private forest into compensation copes;(4) to have the combination of principle both financial cost compensation and opportunity cost compensation, raise compensation standards and implement differential compensation;(5) to obtain stable compensation funding, induce eco-taxes, set up a risk reserve fund, implement carbon sinks, or open ecotrading service market.
作者 蔡艳芝 刘洁
出处 《西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2009年第4期35-40,共6页 Journal of Northwest A&F University(Social Science Edition)
基金 陕西省社科基金资助项目"西部地区新农村建设村镇区域开发模式研究"(06G001Z)阶段性成果
关键词 森林生态补偿 制度创新 国际比较 美国 德国 日本 forest ecological compensation system innovation international comparison USA Germany Japan
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1金三林.国外生态补偿的政策实践及启示[N].中国税务报,2007-06-20.
  • 2MICHAEL KOHLHAAS.Ecological tax reformin Germany from theory to policy[J].Economic Studies Program Series,2000(6):7.
  • 3郭广荣,李维长,王登举.不同国家森林生态效益的补偿方案研究[J].绿色中国(理论版),2005(07M):14-17. 被引量:25
  • 4RHONDA MAZZA.How do you protect the services nature provides while still encouraging economic growth?,New Currency for Conservation[EB/OL].[2008-10-11].http://www.americanforests.org.2007-01-20.
  • 5余利花.国外环保经济补偿机制面面观[N].华南新闻,2004-08-26.
  • 6ALEXANDRA BLANKE.Ecological tax reform in Germany and Interest groups[J].International Review for Environmental Strategies,2002,3(1):81-95.
  • 7邵青还.德拟对森林生态效益采取补偿措施[J].世界林业动态,2004(5):8-9. 被引量:2
  • 8王登举.日本的森林生态效益补偿制度及最新实践[J].世界林业研究,2005,18(5):65-70. 被引量:25
  • 9ROLAND MENGES.Involving household preferences in social abatement decisions:the interaction of public and benefitor payment schemes in the case of green electricity[C].7th IAEE Energy Conference,Bergen,Norway,2005:1-2.
  • 10ERIK SK·RB·CK.Urban forests as compensation measures for infrastructure development[J].Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2007,6(4):279-285.

二级参考文献10

共引文献45

同被引文献390

引证文献30

二级引证文献157

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部