期刊文献+

和谐社会构建中的行政诉讼基本原则 被引量:1

Basic Principles of Administrative Proceedings in Building a Harmonious Society
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了实现和谐社会"民主法治、公平正义、诚信友爱、充满活力、安定有序、人与自然和谐相处"这一伟大目标,必须充分发挥法律规范的作用,以不断发展的法制予以制度化的保障。在这一过程中,行政诉讼的作用将是举足轻重的。而行政诉讼基本原则作为行政诉讼的基本精神和指引导向,其修正与完善将为和谐社会的最终形成提供有力保证。具体而言,应当进一步强化人民法院独立行使审判权原则,促进司法公正;确立司法终局原则,切实发挥司法裁判作为人权保障最后一道屏障的作用;明确调解原则,和缓矛盾,节约司法成本和社会成本,利于执行;引入案卷排他性原则,进一步规范行政主体的执法行为,保障行政相对人的合法权益。 We must give full scope to the role of legal norms and define institutions for ever-developing legal systems, so as to realize the great objective--building a harmonious society with "democracy and rule of law, fairness and justice, trust and love, vigor and vitality, stability and order, harmony between man and nature". During the process, the role of administrative proceedings will be decisive. However, the basic principies Of administrative proceedings, as the basic spirit and guidance-oriented of administrative proceedings, will provide a strong support for the final formation of a harmonious society through its amendment and improvement. In details, we should further strengthen the principle of people courts' exercising judicial power inde- pendently to promote judicial fairness; we must establish the principle of judicial finality to play effectively the role of administration of justice as the last bulwark of protection of human rights; we ought to clear up the principle of mediation and ease conflicts to save costs of justice and society, helping the administrative of justice ; and we will introduce exclusive principle of files to further regulate enforcement actions of executive principals, so as to secure legitimate rights and interests of administrative counferparts.
作者 王晨 李亚兰
出处 《学术交流》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第7期37-40,共4页 Academic Exchange
关键词 和谐社会 司法终局原则 调解原则 harmonious society principle of judicial finality principle of mediation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1罗豪才.和谐社会一定是法治社会.中国政协新闻网http://cppcc.people.com.cn/GB/34957/3319797.html,2005-04-14.
  • 2蒋惠岭.我国实现独立审判的条件与出路[J].人民司法,1998(3):16-17. 被引量:19
  • 3卢跃刚.风云际会,本报今日出击[M].广州:南方日报出版社,2000.
  • 4应松年,杨伟东.我国《行政诉讼法》修正初步设想.中国民商法律网http://www.civillaw.com.cn/article/default.asp?id=21571,2005-09-05.
  • 5王名扬.法国行政法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1988..
  • 6孙林生,邢淑艳.行政诉讼以撤诉方式结案为什么居高不下?——对365件撤诉行政案件的调查分析[J].行政法学研究,1996(3):34-35. 被引量:19
  • 7胡建淼.比较行政法[M].北京:法律出版社,1998:529-530.
  • 8余华.11%行政处罚案卷不合格程序意识淡薄是主要原因.中国普法网http://www.yfzs.gov.cn/,2003-11-20.

共引文献301

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部