期刊文献+

新政后美国行政法发展的重心流变——《行政法的几个核心问题》评介 被引量:5

Shift of Focuses in American Administrative Law after the New Deal:Comment on Some Crucial Issues in Administrative Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 行政法变化的范围可以通过考证不同历史时期行政法学所要回答的核心问题来印证。新政时期随着行政权的膨胀,美国行政法的核心是统一的行政程序法和司法审查的范围问题。20世纪50年代后,行政调查权与福利国家下的政府给付问题成为新的焦点。随着经济发展的停滞,70年代后,追求更有效率的行政成为社会关注的中心,成本效益分析的运用与谢弗林原则的确立正是对此的回应。 The extent of change in administrative law can be demonstrated by considering the different issues that have been crucial in the field over the years. As to the mushrooming administrative power during the New Deal years, the, crucial issues of American administrative law were whether the federal agencies should be subject to a general administrative -procedure statute and the .proper scope of judicial review. After 1950s, administrative inspection power and the government largess in the Welfare -State became the new crucial issues. As the halt of economic development in 1970s, pursuit for more efficient procedure became focus of the society, and the answer were the cost - benefit analysis and Chevron Doctrine.
作者 骆梅英
出处 《当代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第4期140-147,共8页 Contemporary Law Review
基金 2008年度浙江省教育厅"行政承诺研究"(Y200804715) 浙江工商大学青年人才基金项目(Q09-4)
关键词 美国行政法 谢弗林 成本收益分析 US administrative law Chevron cost - benefit analysis history
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1James Landis, Crucial Issues in Administrative Law [J]. Harv. L. Rev., 1940, 53 (1077).
  • 2Bernard Schwartz, Crucial Issues in Administrative Law [J]. Geo. Wash. L. Rev. , 1996, 34 (401).
  • 3Bernard Schwartz, Some Crucial Issues in Administrative Law [J]. Tulsa L. J. , 1992 -1993, 28 (793).
  • 4Patrick Reagan, Designing a New America, Origins of Neal Deal Planning [ M ]. University of Massachusetts Press, 2000.
  • 5王名扬.美国行政法:下[M].北京:中国法制出版社,1999.
  • 6William Brennan, Jr. , Reason , Passion, and "The Progress of the Law" [J]. Cardozo L. Rev. , 1988, 10 (3).
  • 7Rechard B. Stewart,Administrative Law in the Twenty -first Century[ J]. New York L. Rev. ,2003,78( 101 ).
  • 8詹姆斯·M·兰迪斯.《行政过程》.1938年.
  • 9Universal Camera Corp. v. United States Gypsum Co. , 333 U. S. p. 364, p. 395 (1948).
  • 10Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U. S. p. 474 (1951).

引证文献5

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部