摘要
陕甘宁边区1943年的司法大检讨,是两种不同司法理念的交锋,一种是以工农干部为代表的革命传统之司法理念,一种是以白区来延安的知识分子为代表的西方现代司法理念。在这次交锋的过程中,不仅仅有思想理念、理论的提出,更有行为与制度的实践。两种司法理念的不同主要体现在以下问题上,即几审终审更合理、司法是否应独立、司法干部是否以专业能力为必备条件等。这对当今的司法理念和司法实践也有所借鉴和帮助。
There was a great judicial review at 1943 in Shanganning Border Area. Two different judicial ideals encountered. One presented the judicial ideal of traditional revolution by the workers and peasants' cadres; the other presented the modem judicial ideal by the intellectuals coming from the area of Republic of China. Their differences are showed in such issues as the trial grades, judicial independence, etc. These can have some helps on today' s judicial ideas.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第4期38-47,共10页
Law and Social Development
基金
国家社科基金项目"陕甘宁边区高等法院研究"(05BFX007)
关键词
陕甘宁边区
司法检讨
司法理念
Shanganning Border Area
judicial review
judicial ideas