期刊文献+

中美两国企业并购税制的比较研究 被引量:7

Comparable Research on Tax Regimes of Enterprise M&A of both China and United States
原文传递
导出
摘要 美国联邦并购税制历经90年的发展,形成了一套较为完善、合理的法律规则体系。它规制了几乎全部的公司并购所得税问题,堪称全球最为成熟和完善的企业并购税收制度。相比之下,我国现行企业并购税制不仅条文粗略,甚至缺少某些必要的制度安排,有的规定还违背了税收基本原则,已经不能适应实践的需要。为此,我们可以借鉴美国的立法经验,借以完善我国的企业并购税制。 After its ninety years' development, U.S. federal tax regime of corporate mergers & acquisitions has been a system of rules which is rather perfect and rational. It regulates almost all income tax matters of corporate mergers & acquisitions, and may be rated as the most perfect and mature tax regime of enterprise M&A in the world. By contrast, Chinese tax regime of enterprise M&A is rough and even short of some necessary rules, momover, its some rules contravene some basic taxation principles, so that it cannot suit the needs of the practice of enterprise mergers and acquisitions. Therefore, China can use the legislative experiences of United States for referenee to improve upon Chinese tax regime of enterprise M&A.
作者 林德木
机构地区 福州大学法学院
出处 《税务与经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第4期97-103,共7页 Taxation and Economy
关键词 企业并购税制 免税并购 应税并购 比较研究 tax regime of enterprise M&A tax-free corporate M&A taxable corporate M&A comparable research
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Samuel C.,Thompson Jr..Taxable and Tax-free Corporate Mergers,Acquisitions and LBO'S (American Case Series)[M].St.Paul,Minn:West Publishing Company,1994.
  • 2[美]谢里尔·D·布洛克.公司税案例与解析:英文影印本[M].北京:中信出版社,2003:379-390.
  • 3Richard L.,Doernberg,Howard E.,Abrams,Boris I.,Bittker and Lawrence M.Stone.Federal Income Taxation of Corporations[M].Boston:Little,Brown and Company,1994.
  • 4Stephen A.Lind,,Stephen Schwars,,Daniel J.Lathrope and Joshua D.Rosenberg.Fundamentals of Corporate Taxation (Cases and Materials) (Fifth Edition)[M].New York:Foundation Press,2002:594-614.
  • 5Samuel C.Thompson Jr..U.S.Taxation of International Transactions[M].St.Paul,Minn.:West Publishing Company,1995:349 -371.
  • 6Cherie L.Evans,Chris A.Corr.Preventing International Arbitrage in Reorganizations:An Analysis of the Gap Closing Provisions of the Recently Released Final Regulations to Section 367 (b)[J].The International Tax Jouroal,2001,27 (1).
  • 7Catherine Brown and Christine Manolakas.Organizations,Reorganizations,Amalgamations,Divisions and Dissolutions:Cross-Border Assets,Double Taxation and Potential Relief Under the U.S.-Canada Tax Treaty[J].The Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law,1997,26:315-316.
  • 8Richard L.Doemberg and Kees Van Raed.The 1996 United States Model Income Tax Convention:Analysis,Commentary and Comparison[M].Hague:Kluwer Law International,1997:168.

同被引文献47

  • 1李维萍,高天辉.完善我国企业并购分立免税规则的探讨[J].税务与经济,2006(6):91-95. 被引量:4
  • 2李维萍.公司并购的税收协同效应及观点分析[J].涉外税务,2007(5):34-38. 被引量:7
  • 3台湾地区《企业并购法》第四条第四款.
  • 4Dale A. Oesterle , Mergers and Acquisitions, Law Press, pp. 10 -15.
  • 5黄伟峯.并购实务的第一本书[M].台北商周,2002:52.
  • 6王文宇.我国公司法并购法制之检讨与建议-兼论金融机构合并法.月旦法学杂志,2001,01(68):144-144.
  • 7美国.联邦税务法典[M].368条,381条.
  • 82010年8月28日发布的《国务院关于促进企业兼并重组的意见》(国发[2010]27号).
  • 9Pinellas Ice & Storage Co. v. Commissioner, 21 B.T.A 425 (1930).
  • 10Cortland Specialty Co. v. Commissioner, 22 B.T.A. 808 (1931).

引证文献7

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部