吴普所引神农药性与《证类》“本经药”所引神农药性同异考

Study on the Difference between Shennong′s Drug Nature Quoted by Wu Puu and by Shennong′s Drug in Materia Medica in Classified Syndromes (Zheng)

通过《吴普本草》、《证类本草》所载“神农药性”勘比分析，揭示出中国本草文献上几个问题。一、《证类本草》“本经药”的药性是不全的，缺少“有毒、无毒”内容。二、古代《本草经》不是一种本子，而是多种本子。其载药数不仅有３６５种，还有５９５、４４１、３１９种。三、所谓“本经药”、“别录药”也不是固定的，有些药在某些《本草经》中，定为“本经药”，但在《证类本草》类中又定为“别录药”。

Several questions were mentioned through the analysis and comparison of “Shennong′s drug nature” (DN) as quoted by Wu Pu′s Meteria Madica (WP) and Materia Medica of Classified Syndrome (Zheng)(ZL). These include: (1) The DN in ZL are incomplete, the “toxic nontoxic” terms were absent here; (2) There were different editions of ancient “Shennong′s Canon of Materia Medica”, carrying different numbers of drugs, including 365 kinds, 595, 441, 319 kinks respectively; (3) some of the drugs indicated as DN were, strangely, indicated as “drugs of supplemented Records” in ZL.