摘要
民事生活领域中在私人财产权与国家财产权的中间过渡阶段存在着以公用资源为客体的公用财产权。自然状态下公用资源的特殊性与权利状态的制度设计之间不能有机融合,公用资源不得不长期处于自然使用状态而难以进入传统私权调整的层次。市场化的语境中,民法契约制度与物权制度为立法者提供了通过私权机制调整公用资源利用方式的可能性。只有事实支配符合规范的支配,事实的排他与规范的排他一致时,公用资源的私权调整机制才能获得法律上的正当性。
There are some special common property lying between private property and state property. Baeause of the differences in traditional law theories, the natrunal useness of commons conflict with the law design of commons. The legislator can apply law design on common utility through the instruments of contract law and real right system. Commons is facihtated in deal and currency by rights in the process of mark entrance. If predominant fact is consistent in predominate right, and exclusive fact is consistent in exlusive right, the law mechanism is testified legitimate on commons.
出处
《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第4期98-103,共6页
Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
公用资源
私权
支配
排他
common property
private right
predominate right
exclusive right