期刊文献+

高管团队内部动态特征实证研究 被引量:10

Empirical Study on Team Dynamics in Top Management Team
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对中国企业高层管理团队内部动态特征(以沟通、冲突与决策质量作为3个关键变量)的实证研究,发现高层管理团队沟通规范有利于决策质量的提高,而高层管理团队内情绪冲突的增多会降低决策的质量。此外,高层管理团队沟通规范也促进团队内认知冲突的增加。研究结论指出了高层管理团队内部动态特征之间的联系,同时也为业界提高高层管理团队决策质量,进而增进团队绩效提供了方向。 Through the empirical study on the three key variables of team dynamics in Chinese enterprises' Top Management Team (TMT), which are communication, conflict and decision quality, we find out that the improvement of communication norms is beneficial to the improvement of the quality o{ decision making, while the increase of emotion conflict results in the degradation of decision quality. In addition, team communication norm can strengthen the increment of cognitive conflict. This paper also points out the relationship among intra-team dynamics. Besides, it provides the direction of measures taken by industry to improve decision quality and the team performance.
出处 《管理学报》 CSSCI 2009年第7期939-943,共5页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70372032) 电子科技大学中青年学术带头人培养计划资助项目
关键词 高层管理团队 沟通 冲突 决策质量 top management team communication conflict decision quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1HAMBRICK D C,MASON P A.Upper Echelons:The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers[J].Academy of Management Review,1984,9(2):193~206.
  • 2郎淳刚,席酉民,毕鹏程.群体决策过程中的冲突研究[J].预测,2005,24(5):1-8. 被引量:16
  • 3武欣,吴志明.国外团队有效性影响因素研究现状及发展趋势[J].外国经济与管理,2005,27(1):47-50. 被引量:46
  • 4PRIEM R L,LYON D W,DESS G G.Inherent Limitations of Demographic Proxies in Top Management Team Heterogeneity Research[J].Journal of Management,1999,25(6):935~953.
  • 5富萍萍,FARR J L,彭泗清,et al.高新技术企业中的高层管理团队(TMT)的特征和过程[C]//徐淑英,刘忠明.中国企业管理的前沿研究.北京:北京大学出版社,2004.
  • 6LAWRENCE B S.The Black Box of Organizational Demography[J].Organization Science,1997,8(1):1~22.
  • 7FINKELSTEIN S.Power in Top Management Te-ams:Dimensions,Measurement,and Validation[J].Academy of Management Journal,1992,35(3):505~538.
  • 8SMITH A,HOUGHTON S M,HOOD J N,et al.Power Relationships Among Top Managers:Does Top Management Team Power Distribution Matter for Organizational Performance?[J]Journal of Business Research,2006,59(5):622~629.
  • 9陈忠卫,贾培蕊.基于心理契约的高层管理团队凝聚力问题研究[J].管理科学,2004,17(5):46-52. 被引量:45
  • 10焦长勇,项保华.企业高层管理团队特性及构建研究[J].自然辩证法通讯,2003,25(2):57-62. 被引量:30

二级参考文献106

  • 1李文明,赵曙明.基于“3C”模型的企业高层团队不和谐态探因[J].中国人力资源开发,2004,21(11):12-15. 被引量:8
  • 2李玉君.高层管理团队的绩效衡量[J].中国人力资源开发,2005,22(4):31-33. 被引量:3
  • 3Cohen S G & Bailey, D R. What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite[J]. Journal of Management, 1997, 23(3) : 239-290.
  • 4Campion, M A, Medsker, G J & Higgs, A C. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: implications for designing effective work groups[J]. Personnel Psychology, 1993, 46(4): 823-850.
  • 5Campion, M A, Papper, E M, & Medsker, G J. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: a replication and extension[J]. Personnel Psychology, 1996, 49(2): 429-452.
  • 6Klimoski, R & Mohammed, S. Team mental model: construct of metaphor? [J]. Journal of Management, 1994, 20(2): 403-437.
  • 7Mathieu, J E, Heffner, T S, Goodwin, G F, Salas, E, & Cannon-Bowers, J A. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85(2): 273-283.
  • 8Lester, S W, Meglino, B M, Korsgaard, M A. The antecedents and consequences of group potency.- a longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45(2): 352-368.
  • 9Pearee, C L, Gallagher, C A, & Ensley, M D. Confidence at group level of analysis: a longitudinal investigation of the relationship between potency and team effectiveness[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2002,75(1), 115-119.
  • 10Deutsch M. The resolution of conflict[M]. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1973.

同被引文献268

引证文献10

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部