期刊文献+

中日股东代表诉讼激励与约束制度安排立法比较 被引量:5

The Legislative Comparison of the Institutional Arrangement of Restriction and Promotion of Shareholder Representative Lawsuit between China and Japan
下载PDF
导出
摘要 股东代表诉讼具有代表诉讼和代位诉讼的双重性质决定了要对其进行激励与约束。不同的激励与约束举措及其强度表明了不同的立法政策。我国股东代表诉讼可分为追究经营者与非经营者责任诉讼两种类型。针对这两类诉讼应当采用不同的激励与约束制度。 The dual characters of representative lawsuit and subrogate lawsuit of the shareholder representative lawsuit determine to restrict and promote it. Different acts and intension of restriction and promotion indicates the different legislative policy. The shareholder representative lawsuit can be divided into two types: lawsuit of running the liability of the operator and lawsuit of running the liability of the non-operator in our country. We should adopt different systems of restriction and promotion to the two kinds of lawsuit.
作者 孙光焰
出处 《中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第4期97-103,共7页 Journal of South-Central Minzu University (Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"公司治理法律制度研究"(06BFX030)
关键词 公司治理 股东代表诉讼 激励 约束 立法比较 corporate governance shareholder representative lawsuit incentive restriction legislative comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献69

  • 1周剑龙.论股份有限公司经营的内部监督机制──中国公司法发展之前瞻[J].法学评论,1995,13(1):11-18. 被引量:35
  • 2刘俊海.《论股东的代表诉讼提起权》[A].王保树主编.《商事法论集》第1卷[C].法律出版社,1997年版.第110页.
  • 3Harry G. Henn & John R. Alexander, Law of Corporations [M]. New Haven:Yale University press, 1998.
  • 4小林秀之.股东代表诉讼[M].东京:日本评论社,2002.
  • 5伊藤智文.关于企业统治的商法等修改与监事的实务应对[J].商事法务,1998,(22):16-16.
  • 6青山善充·蓓野和夫.判例六法[M].东京:有斐阁,2003.
  • 7德田和幸.股东代表诉论制度中的诉讼和研究[M].东京:一粒社,2001.
  • 8Harry G. Henn & John R. Alexander, Law of Corporations [M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.
  • 9德田和幸.股东代表诉讼制度中的诉讼和解研究[M].东京:一粒社,2001.
  • 10周剑龙.日本的股东代表诉讼制度//王保树.商事法论集:第2卷.北京:法律出版社,1997:261.

共引文献123

同被引文献51

引证文献5

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部