期刊文献+

公平思考与学习行为:社会偏好的实验检验

Fairness Thinking and Behavioral Learning——An Experiment Test about Social Preference
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为验证国内参与者是否也存在公平思考,公平思考对他们策略决定的影响程度和能否加快博弈均衡的出现,以及参与者的行为是由"公平假说"和"学习假说"中的单一模型还是由两个模型混合解释的好,利用自编的软件在计算机上进行冰淇淋蛋糕分配实验,实验结果表明:实验参与者在实验过程中,不仅仅存在学习行为,而且也存在公平思考,学习行为与公平思考都能加快博弈均衡的形成,因此,不能采用单一的学习模型或公平模型来解释参与者的行为。这为构建一个包含学习与公平思考的混合模型来解释实验参与者的行为提供了事实依据。 In order to find the answers to such questions as: whether the domestic participants have fair thinking, whether the fair thinking will affect their strategies and speed up balanced the formation in the game, which is better to use a single fair model or a hybrid model when explaining the participants behavior, a computer software was used on an experiment about the distribution of ice cream cake. Experimental results shows that: The participants in the experimental process have fair thinking as well as learning behavior', both the learning behavior and fair thinking will speed up balanced formation in the game. Hence there is no possibility to use a single fair model or learning model to explain the participants' behavior, which provides a factual basis for building a fair and learning hybrid model to explain the behavior of the participants.
出处 《湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2009年第3期47-52,共6页 Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Social Sciences)
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究后期资助重点项目(06JHQZ0010) 国家自然科学基金项目(70872111) 湖南省教育厅基金(08C398)
关键词 社会偏好 公平假说 学习假说 实验 social preference fairness learning experiment
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Ernst Fehr,Simon Gaè chter.Altruistic punishment in humans[J].Nature,2002,415(10):137-140.
  • 2Bolton,G.E.,Brandts,J.,Ockenfels,A.,Fair procedures:Evidence from games involving lotteries[J].Journal of Economic,2005(115):1 054-1 076.
  • 3Armin,Falk;Urs,Fischbacher.A theory of recip-rocity[J].Games and Economic Behavior,2006,54(2):293-315.
  • 4Armin Falk,Ernst Fehr,Urs Fischbacher.Testing theories of fairness-Intentions matter[J].Games and Economic Behavior,2008(62):287-303
  • 5Gal Y,Pfeffer A,Marzo F,et al.Learning Social Preferences in Games[J].National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI),2004:226-231.
  • 6Berger,U.Fictitious play in 2×n games[J].Journal of Economic Theory,2005(129):139-154.
  • 7J.K.Chong,C.F.Camerer,T.H.Ho,A learning-based model of repeated games with incomplete information[J].Games and Economic Behavior,2006,55(2):340-371.
  • 8TH Ho,Camerer CF,JK Chong.Self-tuning experience weighted attraction learning in games[J].Journal of Economic Theory,2007(133):177-198.
  • 9Roth A.,I.Erev.Learning in extensive form games:experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term[J].Games and Economic Behavior,1995(8):163-212.
  • 10Guth,W.,R.Schmittberger,B.Schwarze.An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining[J].Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,1982(3):367-88.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部