期刊文献+

城市道路交通噪声烦恼度社会调查 被引量:12

A social survey on the community annoyance with urban road traffic noise
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以烦恼度为主观反应指标,采用三种5级程度衡量尺度,对西安市内三条主要干道和两类典型交叉口附近区域内的道路交通噪声进行了烦恼度问卷调查。此次调查针对人口统计学因素(性别、年龄、文化程度、身体健康状况)上的个体差异与等级描述词不同的程度尺度可能对道路交通噪声烦恼度调查结果的影响,以及特定路况条件下的噪声烦恼度与不同机动车辆的行驶噪声烦恼度展开了研究。通过对调查数据的分析处理,发现并初步总结出:与选取不同的烦恼度尺度相比,人口统计学因素对调查结果的影响更加显著;人口统计学因素与特定路况条件下的噪声烦恼度及不同机动车辆的行驶噪声烦恼度无明显相关;但不同机动车辆的行驶噪声烦恼度不同,实际研究中需对摩托车噪声加以重视并区别对待。 A social survey on the community response to road traffic noise was performed along 3 trunk roads and at 2 typical crossings in the city of Xi'an. The effects of demographic variables (sex, age, education level, and healthy status) and 3 diversified 5-levels verbal scales varying in the wording of scale steps, on the measurement of community annoyance to specific vehicles and traffic status was investigated. The data were collected from 311 passersby by means of questionnaires. It is found that compared to the verbal scales, demographic factors are much more important. Noise annoyance is not only related to gender, but also to age. The poor healthy ones express distinct noise sensitivity. There is no obvious correlation between the demographic variables and the community annoyance to specific vehicles and traffic status. Various annoyance verbal scales have to some extent impact on the investigation results. The community annoyances due to specific vehicles, however, are different, more attention should be pay to the noise of moving motorcycle.
出处 《应用声学》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第4期300-307,共8页 Journal of Applied Acoustics
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(批准号:10574104)
关键词 个体差异 噪声烦恼度 道路交通噪声 主观反应 Individual difference, Noise annoyance, Road traffic noise, Subjective response
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1马蕙,矢野隆.关于社会声学研究的回顾[J].噪声与振动控制,2007,27(2):6-10. 被引量:11
  • 2Zaheeruddin et al.A fuzzy model for noise-induced annoyance.IEEE Transaction on systems.man,and cybernetics--Part A:Systems and humans.2006,36(4):697-705.
  • 3Fields J.M,et al.Guidelines for reporting core information from coummunity noise reaction surveys.Journal of Sound and Vibration.1997,206(5):685-695.
  • 4Fields J.M,et al.Recommendation for shared annoyance questions in noise annoyance surveys.Noise as a Public Health Problem.1998,1,481-486.
  • 5Field J.M.Effects of personal and situational variables on noise annoyance in residential areas.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,1993,93(5):2753-2763.
  • 6Yano T,et al.Comparison of community response to road traffic and railway noises.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan,1988,54:489-496.
  • 7马蕙,何毅诚,高辉,蒋国荣,江哲铭,柳孝图,矢野隆,王炳坤,温琇玲,张晴原.关于噪声社会反应测定方法的国际共同研究——中国语噪声调查问题和评价尺度的建构[J].声学学报,2003,28(4):309-314. 被引量:12
  • 8ISO 2631-4,Mechanical vibrafion and shock-evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration Part 4:Guidelines of the evaluation of the effects of vibration and rotational motion on passenger and crew comfort in fixed guidewey transport systems.2001,1-8.

二级参考文献44

  • 1吴颖娇,张邦俊.环境声学的新领域——声景观研究[J].科技通报,2004,20(6):565-568. 被引量:31
  • 2FIELDS J M et al. Standardized general-purpose noise reaction questions for community noise surveys: research and a recommendation. Journal of Sound and Vibration,2001; 242(4): 641--679.
  • 3YANO T et al. International joint study on the measurement of community response to noise: construction of noise annoyance scale in Japanese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan, 2002; 58(2): 101--110.
  • 4KANDA K et al. International joint study on the measurement of community response to noise: Comparison of Japanese noise annoyance modifiers between age brackets and areas. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan,2002; 58(2): 93--100.
  • 5YANO T et al. International joint study on the measurement of community response to noise: The validity of noise annoyance modifiers and question wording in Japanese.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan 2002; 58(3):165--172.
  • 6LEVINEN N. The development of an annoyance scale for community noise assessment. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1981; 74(2): 265---279.
  • 7GUSKI R, FELSCHER-SUHR U. The concept of noise annoyance: how international experts see it. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1999; 223(4): 513--527.
  • 8MOLINO J A. Annoyance and noise. Handbook of Noise Control (Second Edition), 1979; 16:1--9.
  • 9RAINER GUSKI. Community response to environmental noise. Environmental Urban Noise, 2001; 4:111--148.
  • 10BASS B M, CASCIO W F, O'CONNOR E J. Magnitude estimations of expressions of frequency and amount. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974; 59(3): 313--320.

共引文献20

同被引文献103

引证文献12

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部