期刊文献+

3~4岁儿童的错误信念理解:补语句法,语义理解和工作记忆的作用 被引量:5

False belief understanding in 3~4-year-olds: The relative role of sentential complement syntax,semantic comprehension and working memory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 考察3~4岁儿童的错误信念理解中,补语句法,语义理解和工作记忆的作用。共有48名幼儿被试接受了错误信念,补语句法,皮博迪词汇一图片理解和工作记忆测试。结果表明,错误信念理解成绩和补语句法测试得分相关和偏相关显著。回归分析表明,补语句法测试成绩可以显著预测错误信念理解。语义和补语句法能够显著解释错误信念理解成绩的方差变异,同时补语句法可以解释语义对错误信念理解的作用。本研究支持补语句法在错误信念理解中的独特性作用观点。 The relationship between language and theory of mind has been investigated for many years. The aim of the current study reported here was to identify relationship between sentential complement syntax comprehension and false belief understanding for 3 - 4 years old children in Mandarin. Forty-eight preschoolers (39-59 months) were administered with a serial of tests, which included false belief understanding tasks; a sentential complement test followed the procedures of de Villiers's study, Peabody Vocabulary-Picture Test (PPVT), and working memory test. Results showed that false belief understanding was significantly correlated with the scores of sentential complement syntax even controlled age. Regression analyses showed that the scores of complement syntax significantly predicted of the scores of false belief understanding, and sentential complement syntax could explain the role of semantic comprehension on false belief understanding. Our results provided further evidence for the argument that the important and unique role of the special syntax.
出处 《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第3期15-19,25,共6页 Psychological Development and Education
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30770728) 北京市自然科学基金资助项目(7072036)
关键词 错误信念理解 补语句法 工作记忆 语义理解 幼儿 False belief understanding complement syntax working memory semantic comprehension preschool children
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Milligan K,,Astington J W,Dack L A.Language and Theory ofmind:Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-beliefunderstanding[].Child Development.2007
  • 2Tardif T,Wing-Chen So C,Kaciroti N.Language and false belief:Evidence for general,not specific,effects in Cantonese-speaking preschool-ers[].Developmental Psychobiology.2007
  • 3Slade L,Ruffman T.How language does(and does not)relate totheory of mind:A longitudinal study of syntax,semantic,working memoryand false belief[].British Journal of Developmental Psychology.2005
  • 4Papafragou A,Cassidy K,Gleitman L.When we think about thi-nking:The acquisition of belief verbs[].Cognition.2007
  • 5Astington J W,Baird J A.Why language matters for the theory ofmind[].International Journal of Behavioral Development.2004
  • 6Liu D,Wellman H M,Tardif T,et al.Theory of mind develop-ment in Chinese children:A Meta-analysis of false-belief understanding acrosscultures and languages[].Developmental Psychobiology.2008
  • 7Astington J W,Jenkins J M.A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory of mind development[].Developmental Psychobiology.1999
  • 8Wimmer H,Perner J.Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception[].Cognition.1983
  • 9Wellman H M,Cross D,Watson J.Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development:the truth about false belief[].Child Development.2001
  • 10Garfield,J.,Peterson,C.,Perry,T.‘Social Cognition, Language Acquisition and the Development of the Theory of Mind’[].Mind and Language.2001

同被引文献86

引证文献5

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部