期刊文献+

Comparison of Different Extraction Approaches for Heavy Metal Partitioning in Sediment Samples 被引量:1

Comparison of Different Extraction Approaches for Heavy Metal Partitioning in Sediment Samples
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Three extraction methods, ultrasonic assisted extraction (USE), microwave assisted extraction (MSE), and conventional single extraction (CSE), in conjunction with the modified three-stage BCR sequential extraction procedure (SEP) were applied to examine the contents of Cd, Cu, Cr, Ni, Pb and Zn from lake sediment samples, to know whether these techniques can reduce extraction time and improve reproducibility. The SEP and developed alternative single extrac- tion methods were validated by the analysis of certified reference material BCR 601. By the use of optimized sonication and microwave conditions, steps 1, 2 and 3 of the BCR sequential extraction methods (excluding the hydrogen peroxide digestion in step 3, which was not performed with sonication and microwave) could be completed in 15-30 min and 60- 150 s, respectively. The recoveries of total extractable metal contents in BCR 601, obtained by three single extractions ranged from 93.3%-102%, 88.9%-104% and 81.2%-96.2% for CSE, USE and MSE, respectively. The precision of the single extraction methods was found in the range of 3.7%-9.4% for all metals (n = 6). Three extraction methods, ultrasonic assisted extraction (USE), microwave assisted extraction (MSE), and conventional single extraction (CSE), in conjunction with the modified three-stage BCR sequential extraction procedure (SEP) were applied to examine the contents of Cd, Cu, Cr, Ni, Pb and Zn from lake sediment samples, to know whether these techniques can reduce extraction time and improve reproducibility. The SEP and developed alternative single extraction methods were validated by the analysis of certified reference material BCR 601. By the use of optimized sonication and microwave conditions, steps 1, 2 and 3 of the BCR sequential extraction methods (excluding the hydrogen peroxide digestion in step 3, which was not performed with sonication and microwave) could be completed in 15-30 min and 60- 150 s, respectively. The recoveries of total extractable metal contents in BCR 601, obtained by three single extractions ranged from 93.3%-102%, 88.9%-104% and 81.2% 96.2% for CSE, USE and MSE, respectively. The precision of the single extraction methods was found in the range of 3.7%-9.4% for all metals (n = 6).
出处 《Pedosphere》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2009年第4期476-485,共10页 土壤圈(英文版)
基金 Project supported by the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (No.Ac-I/GS/963)
关键词 连续提取方法 湖泊沉积物 重金属 样品 微波辅助萃取 分割 小型企业 搜索引擎 heavy metals, lake sediment, microwave single extraction, modified BCR sequential extraction, ultrasonic single extraction
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Afridi, H. I., Kazi, T. G., Arain, M. B., Jamali, M. K., Kazi, G. H. and Jalbani, N. 2007. Determination of cadmium and lead in biological samples by three ultrasonic-based samples treatment procedures followed by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. J. AOAC Int. 90: 470-478.
  • 2Ashley, K, Andrews, R. N., Cavazos, L. and Demange, M. 2001. Ultrasonic extraction as a sample preparation technique for elemental analysis by atomic spectrometry. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 16:1 147-1 153.
  • 3Bacona, J. R. and Davidson, C. M. 2008. Is there a future for sequential chemical extraction? Analyst. 133: 25-46.
  • 4Davidson, C. M. and Delevoye, G. 2001. Effect of ultrasonic agitation on the release of copper, iron, manganese and zinc from soil and sediment using the BCR three-stage sequential extraction. J. Environ. Monitor. 3: 398-403.
  • 5Fernandez Albores, A., Perez Cid, B., Fernandez Gomez, E. and Falque Lopez, E. 2000. Comparison between sequential extraction procedures and single extractions for metal partitioning in sewage sludge samples. Analyst. 125:1 353- 1 357.
  • 6Filgueiras, A. V., Lavilla, I. and Bendicho, C. 2002. Chemical sequential extraction for metal partitioning in environmental solid samples. J. Environ. Monitor. 4: 823-857.
  • 7Ge, Y., Murray, P. and Hendershot, W. H. 2000. Trace metal speciation and bioavailability in urban soils. Environ. Pollut. 107: 137-144.
  • 8Greenway, G. M. and Song, Q. J. 2002. An ultrasound accelerated sequential extraction method and its application for element partitioning studies in compost from mixed waste streams. J. Environ. Monitor. 4: 950-955.
  • 9Ipolyi, I., Brunori, C., Cremisini, C., Fodor, P., Macaluso, L. and Morabito, R. 2002. Evaluation of performance of time-saving extraction devices in the BCR three-step sequential extraction procedure. J. Environ. Monitor. 4: 541-548.
  • 10Jalbani, N., Kazi, T. G., Arain, M. B., Jamali, M. K., Afridi, H. I. and Sarfraz, R. A. 2006. Application of factorial design in optimization of ultrasonic-assisted extraction of aluminum in juices and soft drinks. Talanta. 70: 307-314.

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部