北京奥运会男子体操单项决赛E组评分研究

The Research on Objectivity of the E Group of Judges Giving Scores in Beijing Olympic Male Gymnastics Competitions

采用文献资料法、数理统计法对奥运会男子体操比赛中6个单项决赛项目的E组裁判评分数据进行了客观性分析,结果表明:6个单项决赛项目的E组裁判员评分的客观性系数都比较高,但评分的随机误差较大;6个项目的评分差异不显著,裁判员评分的标准比较一致,对运动员最后得分的可信度影响不大;极差值和无效分的出现机率较大。建议:合理控制和处理评分误差,减少无效分的出现机率,确保体操裁判评分的客观性。

In this paper,the literature method and mathematical statistics are adopted to analyze E group score data of six individual finals in the Olympic Male Gymnastics Competitions. Result shows that：the score data of all six individual finals have high objectivity coefficient,but random error of the score is big too;there isn＇t much difference in the six projects＇ score,the judging standards of rdcrens are basically the same,which takes little effect on the reliability of athletes＇ final score;there is a large chance of the emergence of poor and invalid value, this paper then gives some recom- mendations to improve the referees＇ judging objectivity：control and handle score error reasonably,and reduce the chance of giving a score with invalid value.