期刊文献+

意见不一致时的策略:应用GRADE网格对临床实践指南达成共识 被引量:23

Use of GRADE grid to Reach Decisions on Clinical Practice Guidelines when Consensus is Elusive
下载PDF
导出
摘要 指南制定委员会的结构庞大和多元化使达成共识变得困难。Roman Jaeschke及其同事阐述了一种达成共识的简单方法,即当无法取得一致时,应用GRADE网格对临床实践指南达成共识。
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 2009年第7期730-733,共4页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Schbnemann HI,Jaeschke R,Cook DJ,et al.An official ATS statement:grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in ATS guidelines and recommendations.Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2006,174(5):605-614.
  • 2Guyatt GH,Oxman AD,Vist GE,et al.GRADE:an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.BMJ,2008,336(7650):924-926.
  • 3Guyatt GH,Oxman AD,Kunz R,et al.What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ,2008,336(7651):995-998.
  • 4Guyatt GH,Oxman AD,Kunz R,et al.Going from evidence to recommendations.BMJ,2008,336(7652):1049-1051.
  • 5Schunemann HJ,Oxman AD,Brozek I,et al.Grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies.BMJ,2008,336(7653):1106-1110.
  • 6Guyatt GH,Oxman AD,Kunz R,et al.Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations.BMJ,2008,336(7654):1170-1173.
  • 7Fretheim A,Schbnemann HJ,Oxman AD.Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development:3.Group composition and consultation process.Health Res Policy System,2006,4:15.
  • 8Fretheim A,Schunemann HJ,Oxman AD.Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development:5.Group processes.Health Res Policy System,2006,4:17.
  • 9Murphy MK,Black NA,Lamping DL,et al.Consensus development methods,and their use in clinical guideline development.Health Technol Assess,1998,2(3):i-iv,1-88.
  • 10Thangaratinam S,Redman CWE.The Delphi technique.The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist,2005,7(2):120-125.

同被引文献1005

引证文献23

二级引证文献403

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部