期刊文献+

文学性问题研究综述 被引量:1

Review on the Literariness Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 西方文学理论中的文学性研究有两条路径,即将其作为客观本质属性或作为历史惯例的产物。20世纪80年代,中国重提文学性问题,出现了新世纪文学性是否存在泛化的论争。文学性被赋予了多种现代内涵,呈现出建构文学性的多维学理思路。这种争论为重释文学性提供了新的思想路径,拓展了文学及文学理论研究的空间。 The literariness study in western literary theory oriented in two directions: literariness is regarded as objective essential attribute or as product of the historical conventions. In 1980s, literariness was raised and discussed again in China, and a debate arose over whether the literariness had been generalized. Literariness was endowed with various modern connotations, which revealed different trains of thoughts to construct the literariness, provided a new way to reinterpret the literariness, and expanded the research space of the literature and literary theory.
作者 董冬
出处 《湖州职业技术学院学报》 2009年第2期58-61,共4页 Journal of Huzhou Vocational and Technological College
关键词 文学性 泛化 现代内涵 literariness generalization modern connotation
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献1

  • 1[1][13]Jonathan Culler,"The Literary of Theory" ,in What's Left of Theory, ed. Judith Butler,John Guillory & Kendall Thomas, New York & London: Routledge, 2000, p.289, p. 290.

共引文献172

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部