期刊文献+

行动者网络理论与超学科知识生产模式 被引量:15

Actor-Network Theory and Knowledge-producing Pattern of Transdisciplinary
下载PDF
导出
摘要 科学社会学、知识社会学和科学知识社会学等学科通过考察科学活动和知识的社会本性,彻底颠覆了传统意义上的客观主义和理性主义科学观和知识观。实验室研究、行动者网络理论与超学科研究都证明了,我们时代的科学研究和知识生产必须通过各类异质的成分之间对话,通过科学家与社会利益相关者的对话和交流才能实现。实验室研究、行动者网络理论和超学科研究不仅表征了信息化、网络化和全球化的"大科学时代"的知识生产模式,而且也体现了存在论意义上的一种态度或世界观。 After the examination of the sociality of both activities of science and knowledge,sociology of science,sociology of knowledge,sociology of scientific knowledge and other disciplines have been thoroughly overthrown the traditional objectivism and rationalism views of science and knowledge. The laboratory studies,actor-network theory and transdisciplinary studies have all held that only through dialogs among a variety of heterogenous components and through communications and interactions between scientists and stakeholders of social interests can the scientific research and production of knowledge be realized. Laboratory studies,actor-network theory and transdisciplinary studies are not only a theoretical representation of the knowledge-producing pattern in the age of Big Science against the background of?informatization,network and globalization,but also a reflection of ontological attitude or worldview.
作者 严国萍
出处 《浙江社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第7期10-14,共5页 Zhejiang Social Sciences
关键词 实验室研究 行动者网络理论 超学科研究 知识生产 Laboratory Studies,Actor-Network Theory,Transdisciplinary Studies,Production of Knowledge
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献68

  • 1S.凯斯基南,H.西利雅斯,黄育馥(摘译).研究结构和研究资助的学科界限变化——欧洲8国调查[J].国外社会科学,2006(2):68-73. 被引量:6
  • 2培根.《新工具》[M].商务印书馆,1984..
  • 3T.W. Clark: The Policy Process: A Practical Guide for Natural Resource Professionals, Yale University Press, New Haven, 2002, pp. 215.
  • 4J. F. Flinterman, et al. ,“Transdisciplinarity: The New Challenge for Biomedical Research”, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, Vol. 21, 2001, pp. 253-266.
  • 5S.O. Funtowicz and J.R. Ravetz, "Science for the Post - Normal Age", Futures, vol. 25, 1993, pp. 739 - 755.
  • 6M. Gibbons, C. Limoge, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and P. Trow P., The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Sage Publications, London, 1994, p. 179.
  • 7G. Hirsch Hadorn, D. Bradley, C. Pohl, St. Rist, and U. Wiesmann, "Implications of Transdisciplinarity for Sustainability Research", Ecol Econ, vol. 60, 2006, pp. 119 - 128.
  • 8G. Hirsch Hadorn et al. (eds.), Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, Dordrecht; London: Springer, 2008.
  • 9E. Jantsch, "Towards Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity in Education and Innovation", In: L. Apostel et al. ( eds. ), Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and Center for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI), Paris, 1972, pp. 97 - 121.
  • 10R.W. Kates, et al., "Sustainability Science", Science, Vol. 292, 2001, pp. 641 - 642.

共引文献93

同被引文献200

引证文献15

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部