期刊文献+

“理性人”标准作为事故过失责任认定标准的经济分析

Economic Analysis Regarding the Reasonable Person Standard as the Accident Negligence Responsibility Determination Standard
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以"理性人"标准作为事故过失责任认定,实质上是以"理性人"的注意水平来确定过失之有无。"理性人"标准下会导致分配成本不当之后果,但放弃个别标准带来的分配所得换取成本的减少是有效率的;在弱的意义上看,"理性人"标准下过失责任会比严格责任事故数量少。"理性人"标准与个别标准两者权衡时,应遵循:当决定一个人应尽注意水平的成本较低或若用减少引起事故的行为代替增加注意的可行性越强,背离"理性人"标准很可能是不允许的。 Regarding the reasonable person standard as the accident negligence responsibility determination standard is in fact to determine negligence or not by the attention level of the reasonable person. There seems the phenomenon of distribution cost improper under the reasonable person standard, but distributive income obtained at the cost of giving up the individual standard, in exchange for the reduce of cost, which is effective. The quantity of negligence responsibility accident is less than that of strict responsibility accident under the reasonable person standard. When weighing the reasonable person standard and the individual standard, we should follow: when deciding a person should decrease the cost of the attention level as much as possible, or the feasibility which the accident act instead of increase attention by decreasing is stronger, the standard of deviating from the reasonable person is probably impermissible.
作者 熊春泉 张静
出处 《江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2009年第3期40-45,共6页 Journal of Jiangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 “理性人” “理性人”标准 过失责任 经济分析 reasonable person reasonable person standard negligence responsibility economic analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 13Bing.(N.C.)467,132Eng.Rep.490.
  • 2Billings&Sons v.Riden[1958]A.C.Reid.240,255,per Lond.
  • 3拉伦茨.德国法上损害赔偿之归责原则[A].王泽鉴译.民法学说与判例研究(第五册)[M].台北:三民书局,1991.
  • 4[美]哈特.惩罚与责任[M].王勇,等译.北京:华夏出版社,1989:127.
  • 5[美]威廉·M.兰德斯,理查德·A.波斯纳.侵权法的经济结构[M].王强,杨嫒译.北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
  • 6[美]波斯纳 苏力译.法理学问题[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994..
  • 7[美]斯蒂文·萨维尔.事故法的经济分析[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2004.

共引文献90

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部