期刊文献+

浅谈高校教师教学效果评估 被引量:4

A Brief Discussion about the Evaluation of Teaching Effects of the University Teachers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 教学质量是学校的生命,关系着学校的生存和教育的发展。目前从国家到各高校都十分重视教学质量的评估和考核,如何根据高校的特点对高校教师的教学效果进行科学、合理、准确地评估是非常值得探讨的问题。本文通过对高校现行评估模式存在的问题的研究,并结合柯克帕特里克的培训效果评估模型的理论,探讨高校的教学效果评估设计的新思路和新方法。 The teaching quality is the life of a university, which is considered to be related to the survival and development of the university. Thus, great importance has been placed to the evaluation of teaching quality, from the state administrative organs to universities themselves. It is of significance to have a probe into the establishment of a scientific, reasonable and precise evaluation system to evaluate the teaching effects of the university teachers. Based on the evaluation module of training set up by Donald L. Kirkpatrick ( 1937 - ), this paper has discussed a-bout the problems existed in the present evaluation system, hoping that a new way will be found out to improve the evaluation of teaching quality in universities.
作者 粟郁
出处 《绵阳师范学院学报》 2009年第6期135-138,146,共5页 Journal of Mianyang Teachers' College
关键词 教学效果评估 培训评估模型 evaluation of teaching effects evaluation module of training
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献16

  • 1Palomba C A, Banta T W. Assessment Essentials: Planning, Implementing, and Improving Assessment in Higher Education[M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1999.
  • 2Whitehead A N. The Aims of Education and Other Essays[M]. New York: The Free Press , 1929.
  • 3Bruner J. Acts of Meaning[M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.
  • 4Roblyer M D, Edwards J, Havriluk M A. Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching [M]. Merrill, 1997.
  • 5Wilson, B. What Is a Constructivist Learning Environment? In Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design edited by Wilson, Educational Technology Publications[G]. Englewood Cliffs: New Jersey: 07632. 1996.
  • 6McCombs B, Whistler J S. The Learner-Centered Classroom and School: Strategies for Increasing Student Motivation and Achievement [M]. San Francisco: Josey-Bass Publishers, 1997.
  • 7Jungck J. Constructivism, Computer Exploratorium, and Collaborative Learning: Construction Scientific Knowledge[J]. Teaching Education, 1991, 3(2): 151-170.
  • 8Holt D G, Willard-Holt C. Let's Get Real: Students Solving Authentic Corporate Problems [J]. Phi Delta Kappan, 2000, 82: 243-246.
  • 9CTGV (Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt). Technology and theDesign of Generative Learning Environments[J]. Educational Technology, 1991,31 (5) : 34-40.
  • 10Harris D, Bell C. Evaluating and Assessing for Learning[M]. London, England: Kogan, 1998.

共引文献17

同被引文献21

  • 1付兵儿.日本中小学德育的体验教育及其启示[J].天津师范大学学报(基础教育版),2004,5(2):51-54. 被引量:13
  • 2陈建华.体验式教育的心理学分析与实践探索[J].理工高教研究,2006,25(1):109-110. 被引量:19
  • 3马丽娜,南纪稳.探究体验式教学[J].当代教育论坛(学科教育研究),2007(6):70-71. 被引量:102
  • 4艾军.体验式教学在心理学课中的应用研究.科技信息(学术研究),2008,(5).
  • 5.马克思恩格斯选集,第3卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995..
  • 6[美]霍华德·加德纳.多元智能(沈致隆译)[M].北京:新华出版社.2004.
  • 7Beauchamp, George A. Curriculum Theory [M]. Wilmette The Kagg Press, 1968.
  • 8Tomlinson C A, Brighton C, Hertberg H, et al. Differentia- ting Instruction in Response to Student Readiness, Interest, and Learning Profile in Academically Diverse Classrooms:A Review of Literature[J]. Journal for the Education of the Gifted,2003,27(2) :119-145.
  • 9川喜田二郎.凳想法の科学[M].东京:中央公论社,1995.
  • 10皇甫江波.论学生评分与教学效果评估[J].科教文汇,2008(15):29-29. 被引量:1

引证文献4

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部