摘要
In the history of philosophy,Kierkegaard is seldom connected with Kant.However,concerning religious faith,Kierkegaard is consistent with Kant in some aspects such as the criticism of the ontological proof of God’s existence,and the conflict between "understanding" and "faith".The difference of the two is,while Kant tries to keep religion within the limits of reason alone by way of critique of practical reason,Kierkegaard sticks to the paradoxical "Incarnation",insisting that "passion" is appropriate for Christian faith.Paradoxically,every passion wishes its own downfall,therefore,this kind of emphasis on passion and its destructive power opens up the critical and even deconstructive dimensions of Kierkegaard’s thoughts.
In the history of philosophy,Kierkegaard is seldom connected with Kant.However,concerning religious faith,Kierkegaard is consistent with Kant in some aspects such as the criticism of the ontological proof of God's existence,and the conflict between 'understanding' and 'faith'.The difference of the two is,while Kant tries to keep religion within the limits of reason alone by way of critique of practical reason,Kierkegaard sticks to the paradoxical 'Incarnation',insisting that 'passion' is appropriate for Christian faith.Paradoxically,every passion wishes its own downfall,therefore,this kind of emphasis on passion and its destructive power opens up the critical and even deconstructive dimensions of Kierkegaard's thoughts.
出处
《哲学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第7期72-77,共6页
Philosophical Research
