期刊文献+

城市交通仿真中的延误计算模型对比分析 被引量:3

Contrastive Analysis of Delay Determined Models in Urban Traffic Simulation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 论述了三种城市交通仿真(HCM2000、CORSIM软件、VISSIM软件)中的延误计算模型,在不同的交通流状态下,应用此三种延误计算模型进行了单点固定控制交叉口控制周期延误的仿真计算,并采用典型的美国城市交叉口实例进行了对比分析,得出以下结论:在交叉口接近饱和状态的情况下,HCM2000的延误计算模型得到的周期延误最小,在过饱和的情况下,HCM2000计算得到的周期延误最大。 Three delay determined models (in HCM2000, CORSIM and VISSIM, respectively) in urban traffic simulation were discussed. According to different traffic flow conditions, these three models were applied to the simulative calculation of cycle delay for fixed-time signalized intersection. In the case study, raw data of an USA intersection was used to the contrastive analysis of these three models, and several conclusions were drawn: in the condition when the intersection is near saturation, simulative cycle delay of HCM2000 model is smaller than that of any other two; While the intersection is over saturation, simulative cycle delay of HCM2000 model is the largest.
出处 《系统仿真学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第13期3880-3884,共5页 Journal of System Simulation
基金 "863"国家高科技资助项目(2006AA11Z203 2007AA11Z2008) 英东基金(104007) 北京交通大学重点基金项目(2006X2004)
关键词 交通仿真 信号交叉口 控制延误 延误模型 稳态交通流 traffic simulation signalized intersection control delay delay model stable traffic flow
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1魏明,杨方廷,曹正清.交通仿真的发展及研究现状[J].系统仿真学报,2003,15(8):1179-1183. 被引量:56
  • 2McShane W R, Roess R P, Prassas E S. Traffic Engineering [M]. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 1998.
  • 3Transportation Research Board. Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000) [K]. Washington DC, USA: National Research Council Files, 2000: 340-365.
  • 4Steering Committee Traffic Control and Traffic Safety of Germany. Guidelines for Traffic Signals (RILSA) [S]. Berlin, Germany: Road and Transportation Research Association, 1992.
  • 5Park B, Schneeberger J D. Microscopic simulation model calibration and validation: A case study of VISSIM for a coordinated actuated signal system [C]// Transportation Research Recoard-1280, Washin gton DC, USA. USA: Transportation Research Board, 1990: 148- 156.
  • 6Milam R T, Choa F. Recommended guidelines for the calibration and validation of traffic simulation models [C]// Proc., 8th TRB Conference on the Application of Transportation Planning Methods, Washington, DC 20001 USA: Transportation Research Board Business Office. 2002:178-187.
  • 7Hourdakis J, Michalopoulos P G. A practical procedure for calibrating microscopic traffic simulation models [J]. Journal of Transportation Research Board: Transportation Research Record, 2003, 1852: 130-139.
  • 8Benekohal R F, El-Zohairy Y. General uniform delay model for signalized intersections [C]// Proc., 3rd Int. Symp. on Highway Capacity, Copenhagen, Denmark. Washington DC, USA: United States Transportation Research Board, 1998.
  • 9Benekohal R F, EI-Zohairy Y. Multi-regime arrival rate uniform delay models for signalized intersections [J]. Transportation Research Part A (S0965-8564), 2001, 35(7): 625-677.
  • 10Kim R F Benckohal. Comparison of Control Delays from CORSIM and the Highway Capacity Manual for Oversaturated Signalized Intersections [J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering (S0733- 947X), 2005, 131(12): 917-923.

二级参考文献40

共引文献135

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部