期刊文献+

破坏与建设:顾颉刚对古史研究的态度

Construction and Destruction:Gu Jiegang's Attitude toward the Research of Ancient History
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在中国现代学术史上,顾颉刚以大胆疑古和编著《古史辨》而闻名。长期以来,学界对他的疑古思想褒贬不一。顾颉刚认为研究古史应先破后立。从学术分工的角度而言,既需人做破坏的工作,也需人做建设的工作。顾颉刚研究古史偏于疑古辨伪方面,并不说明他不主张建设真古史,而只是从分工合作的角度出发,以辨伪史为己任,其最终目的是辨伪求真。只有正确把握其思想与实践的真实意图,评价才能接近客观。 In the modern academic history ,Gu Jiegang is well known for his daring suspition of the ancient history and the compiling of his great work of Distingushing the Ancient History. For a long time , the academia has a mixed attitude toward his suspition of the ancient history. Gu Jiegang hold that the research of the ancient history should be conducted firstly by destructuring and then by constructuring. In terms of academic division, there should be someone to do the work of destruction and also someone to do the work of construcion. Gu Jiegang's research of the ancient history mainly focus on distingusing the fake of ancient history, but this does not mean that he do not go for the construction of real ancient history. In terms of cooperation and division of labor, he deemed it as his duty to distinguish the ancient history, the ultimate purpose is to distinguish the truth from the fake. Only by grasping the real intention of ideology and practice appropriately, can our evaluation be more objective.
作者 董恩强
出处 《广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第3期135-139,共5页 Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 顾颉刚 疑古 古史研究 学术分工 态度 Gu Jiegang suspition of the ancient history research of the ancient history cooperation and the division of labor attitude
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1欧阳哲生.傅斯年全集[M].长沙:湖南教育出版社,2003.
  • 2王国华.王静安先生遗书序[M]//沈楚瑾.追忆王国维.北京:中国广播电视出版社,1997.
  • 3王国维.观堂集林:下[M].石家庄:河北教育出版社,2001.
  • 4王国维.古史新证[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1994..
  • 5杜正胜.从疑古到重建──傅斯年的史学革命及其与胡适、顾颉刚的关系[J].中国文化,1995(2):224-237. 被引量:40
  • 6曹伯言.胡适日记全编:8[M].合肥:安徽教育出版社,2001.
  • 7傅斯年.《历史语言研究所工作之旨趣》[J].国立中央研究院历史语言研究所集刊,1928,.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部