中国经济法学总论30年研究：关键词视角

Research on General Principles of Chinese Economic Law in Thirty Years:A Perspective of Keywords

经济法是现代法,极少有现代化与传统冲突的痛苦,其开放性和对新观念、新理论的强劲吸纳能力,便于从现代化的理论和实践中获得支撑。中国经济法学总论30年研究表明,在我国传统、现代与后现代的共时性存在的具体语境下,经济法总论重在探究市场与政府、经济与法律、私法与公法这三对关键词。经济法既是"有关经济的法",又是"经济法"。认真对待经济法,就必须克服"中国式"市场与政府、经济与法律、国家与社会、科技与财政等种种挑战,介于经济私法与经济公法、经济学与经济政策、经济行政与经济行政政策、传统与现代等横切面之间进行研究。经济法应主要作为法律科学而不是法律部门,经济法理论应由"小经济法"转向"大经济法"。这种"否定之否定"的角色转型,有助于解决"中国经济法学向何处去"的问题,真正面向中国社会的真问题,与西方经济法学前沿理论开展有建设性的对话。

As a modern law, the economic law lacks the pain from conflicts between modernization and tradition. The economic law is widely open and strongly absorbtive for the new conceptions and theories, thus it is available to find a convincing support from modern theories and practice. The research indicates that, in the specific context of China, in which traditionalism, modernism and post - modernism exist synchronically, the general theories of the economic law stress on three pairs of key words, namely, market and government, economy and law, private law and public law. The economic law refers to not only ＂the law concerning economy＂, but also the specific ＂economic law＂. In a serious study on the economic law, various challenges should be overcome, such as ＂Chinese -mode＂ market and government, economy and law, nation and society, technology and finance; and the research focuses should be laid on the interdisciplinary sections between private e- conomic law and public economic law, economics and economic policies, economic administration and economic administrative policies, and traditionalism and modernism. The economic law should be specified as an academic discipline rather than a section of law, further, jurisprudence of the economic law should transfer from the ＂narrow - sense economic law＂ to the ＂broad - sense economic law＂. The role transition from ＂negation to negation＂ helps to settle the issue that ＂what is the direction of the jurisprudence of Chinese economic law＂, to better face the real problem of China＇ s society, and to initiate constructive dialogues with the most advanced jurisprudence of economic law in western countries.