期刊文献+

三种麻醉方法对妇科腹腔镜手术患者的影响 被引量:3

A contrast research on three different anaesthesias methods in gynecology peritoneoscope surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的三种麻醉方法(腰硬联合加浅全麻、气管内插管、喉罩)对妇科腹腔镜手术患者的影响。方法90例ASA评级Ⅰ-Ⅱ级择期妇科腹腔镜手术患者随机分为3组,每组30例。Ⅰ组采用腰硬联合加浅全麻;Ⅱ组采用气管内插管麻醉;Ⅲ组采用喉罩麻醉。监测PetCO2、HR、SpO2和MAP等血流动力学指标。结果Ⅲ和Ⅱ组比较,在T1、T2、T3时,PetCO2变化有显著性差异(P<0.01),SpO2无明显差异,Ⅰ、Ⅱ和Ⅲ组三者亦无明显差异。在T1、T2时,Ⅲ和Ⅰ组比较,HR,MAP比较有明显差异(P<0.05),Ⅰ、Ⅱ和Ⅲ组三者亦无明显差异。结论腰硬联合加浅全麻在妇科腹腔镜手术中是一种安全有效的麻醉方法。 Objective To discuss the three different anaesthesias methods in gynecology peritoneoscope surgery (Combined Spinal Epidural Analgesi, pure tube-inserting, Larynx Mask). Method 90 case of patients stochastically divide into the CESA group( group Ⅰ), the pure tube-inserting group (group Ⅱ), and the Larynx Mask group( group Ⅲ), Then separatedly monitor and record their PetCO2,HR,SpO2 and MAP. Results After CO2 pneumoperitoneum, HR of the patients in group I speeds up, their PetCO2 elevates obviously (P 〈 0. 01 ) ; the response of the patients in group Ⅱ/Ⅲ becomes active when pneumoperitoneum, the change of MAP,HR is more remarkable than that before pneumopefitoneum (P 〈 0. 01 ). Each target of the three groups of patients has been improved T1, T2 and T3. after pneumoperitoneum, Each target is quite close to that before pneumoperitoneum T1 and T2 after Exhausting. The consciousness of the patients in group i regains more quickly compared to those in group Ⅱ/Ⅲ after the surgery (P 〈 0. 001 ). Conclusion The CSEA assisted by the shallow and general vein anesthesia was the effective method in the gynecology perhoneoseope surgery.
作者 吕有文
出处 《中国实用医药》 2009年第21期84-86,共3页 China Practical Medicine
关键词 妇科腹腔镜手术 腰硬联合加浅全麻 患者 临床分析 Gynecology peritoneoscope surgery CESA
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献14

  • 1Troy AM, Huthinson RC, Kenny GNC, et al. Treacheal intubating conditions using proprfol and remifentanil target-controlled infudions. Anaesthesia, 2002,57:1204-1207.
  • 2Crankshaw DP, Chan C, Leslie K, et al. Remifentanil concentration during target-controlled infusion propofol. Anesth Intensive Care, 2002, 30:578-583.
  • 3Wakeline HG, Zimmerman JB, Howell S, et al. Targeting effect compartment or central compartment concentration of propofol: what predicts loss of consciousness? Anesthesiology, 1999,90:92-97.
  • 4Glen JB. Quality ofanesthesia during spontaneous respiration a proposed scoring system. Anaesthesia, 1991,46: 1081-1082.
  • 5Aldrate AJ, Kroulik D. A post anaesthetic recovery score. Anaesth Analg, 1970,49:923-924.
  • 6Shafer SL, Gregg KM. Algorithms to rapidly achieve and maintain stable drug concentrations at the site of drug effect with a computer-controlled infusion pump. J Pharmacokinet Biopharmaceutics, 1992,20:147-169.
  • 7Jacobs JR, Williams EA. Algorithms to control effect compartment drug concentrations in pharmacokinetic model-driven drug delivery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 1993,40:993-999.
  • 8Kim DW, Kil HY, White PF. Relationship between clinical endpoints for induction of anesthesia and bispectral index and effect-site concentration values. J Clin Anesth, 2002,14:241-245.
  • 9Drummond JC. Monitoring depth of anesthesia. Anesthesiology, 2000,93:876-882.
  • 10Struys MR, Tom DS, Birgit D, et al. Comparison of plasma comp ̄artment versus two methods for effect compartment-controlled target-controlled infusion for propofol. Anesthesiology, 2000,92:399-406.

共引文献110

同被引文献9

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部