期刊文献+

我国公司人格否认制度之探析 被引量:1

On the System of Corporate Personality Negation in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 英美等国采用判例法形式将公司人格否认之诉适用于个案,而我国则以成文法的形式将这一规则引入,因过于原则、抽象,存有制定法的固有缺陷,在实务上难以操作。同时,很容易造成法官滥施人格否认之裁判及债权人滥诉。为弥补该缺陷,应明确该诉之诉讼时间、证明责任及法官裁判案件的适用要件,同时发挥司法解释及案例指导的作用。 Countries like UK and US take the case--law form to sue the company personality otherwise person are suitable for the case. China introduces this rule in the form of written laws. However, as this rule seems too general and abstract and has the inherent flaw of written laws, it is very difficult to operate in practice. At the same time, the judges are prone to abuse the right to execute referee and the creditor are liable to abuse the personality denial. In order to make up this flaw, the lawsuit time, the certificate responsibility and judge the referee case's suitable important document should be made clear and the judicial interpretation and the case instruct function should be brought into full play.
作者 吴鹃
出处 《西南农业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2009年第4期33-37,共5页 Journal of Southwest Agricultural University:Social Science Edition
关键词 公司人格否认 诉讼 公司法 orporate personality negation lawsuit corporation law
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献21

  • 1李凌燕.〔日本〕法人格的否认[J].环球法律评论,1994,16(3):86-88. 被引量:21
  • 2Frank H Easterbrook;Daniel R Fischel.The Economic Structure of Corporate Law,1991.
  • 3董〓.司法解释论[M]中国政法大学出版社,1999.
  • 4施天涛.公司法论[M]法律出版社,2005.
  • 5王保树,崔勤之.中国公司法原理[M]社会科学文献出版社,2006.
  • 6安建主编,袁杰[等].中华人民共和国公司法释义[M]法律出版社,2005.
  • 7李飞,王学政.中华人民共和国公司法释义[M]中国市场出版社,2005.
  • 8Sanborn,J.in United States v.Milwaukee Refrigerator Transit CoF (CCEDWis ).
  • 9Ribstein.Limited Liability and Theories of the Corporation,1991.
  • 10Stephen B Presser.Piercing the Corporate Veil,2004.

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部