经注与诸子

Classics Annotations and Independent Thinkers' Books

不同著作间的内容相关度有两种基本的关系类型——经注关系与诸子关系。诸子关系是一般类型,即基本不相关,两相平等;经注关系则联系密切,大体同构。在此观照下不难发现,诠释经典的著作并非只有典型的"注疏"体,还存在与原典具有一定程度"诸子"关系的解经著作体式。这样,从原典到其注疏,到比较相关的著作,再到几乎不相关的著作,就构成一个渐变的著作形态序列。由此序列可以从一种动态统一的视角看待不同著作间的内容关系。文章最后利用经子模型阐述了作者对哲学诠释学的总体把握,并探讨了注疏体著作、诸子体著作与学术因创的辩证关系,展现了区分经注关系与诸子关系的实践意义以及二者整合统一的可能性暨现实性。

There are two basic types of content correlativity between different books. As the common, defauh type, “independent-thinker relationship” refers to books irrelative, equal to each other; while “classics-annotation relationship” refers to books closely relative, almost parallel to each other. From this point of view, we can easily find that books which explain classics include not only the typical form of annotation, but other forms that have some kind of independent-thinker relationship with the original book. Thus, the original book, its closely relative annotations, books comparatively relative, and books almost irrelative, form a shading sequence of form types of books. This article discusses the dialectic relationship between book form type of annotation, of independent thinker and repetition, exploration in academe, revealing the practical significance of the differentiation of these two types of content correlativity, as well as the possibility and reality of integrating the two.