摘要
在二语语用习得研究中,语法知识历来被认为是影响语用知识的一个重要因素。以往对语法与语用知识关系的研究中,多把通用语法知识与具体语言结构的语用知识作相关分析,造成二者研究层面不对等的现象。本文以学习者对英语情态动词的习得情况为例,分别探讨通用语法知识和具体语法知识对语用知识的预测力。两组回归分析的结果发现,具体语法知识对与之相关的语用知识的预测力更强,从而在一定程度上支持了Bardovi-Harlig所提建议的正确性:对具体语用能力的研究最好通过考察相应的具体语法能力来进行。本研究还发现语用知识的习得是一个相对独立的过程,因此应该把语用能力的培养放到和语法教学同样重要的地位。
Studies of SLA pragmatics have always taken grammar as one of the most important factors that influence pragmatic development. They usually correlate general grammatical knowledge with the particular pragmatic features of some specific linguistic structures,which seems to be illogical. The present study addresses the issue of the respective predictability of general and specific grammatical knowledge on pragmatic knowledge. Specific grammatical knowledge and pragmatic knowledge are examined through the learners' performance on the English modal verbs. Two regression analyses suggest that specific grammatical knowledge has a stronger predictive effect on pragmatic knowledge of English modal verbs. This result in a sense supports Bardovi-Harlig's recommendation that studies on the relationship between grammatical knowledge and pragmatic knowledge should be conducted at the same specific linguistic level. The present study also finds that pragmatic development is a relatively autonomous process. Therefore,teaching pragmatic knowledge is as important as that of grammatical knowledge.
出处
《外语教学与研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第4期284-290,共7页
Foreign Language Teaching and Research