期刊文献+

“知道”的语境敏感性:质疑与辩护 被引量:6

Arguments against and for the Contextual Sensitivity of "Knowing"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 认知语境主义者认为,"知道"是语境敏感的,"知道"的语境敏感性表现为"知道"是省略的、含糊的、等级的、标识的、对比的。认知语境主义的反对者试图借错误理论异议、等级性异议和澄清技术异议来反对认知语境主义,其实这些反对意见都是站不住脚的。知识是语境敏感的,知识的结构是CKap,其含义是:a在语境C下知道p。 Cognitive contextualists hold that "knowing" is context-sensitive, and that the contextual sensitivity of "knowing" is characterized by such features as being elliptical, vague, gradable, indexical and contrastive. Opponents of cognitive contextualism try to invalidate cognitive contextualism by the error-theory objection, the gradability objection and the elarificationtechnique objection, none of which, this paper argues, are tenable. Knowled.ge is context-sensitive; the structure of knowledge is CKap, which means a knows p in the context of C.
作者 曹剑波
机构地区 厦门大学哲学系
出处 《厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第4期13-20,共8页 Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"知识与语境"(07JC720007)
关键词 知道 知识归因 认知语境主义 语境敏感性 knowing, knowledge-attributing, cognitive contextualism, contextual sensitivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献17

  • 1普特南.理性、真理与历史[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1997..
  • 2汉森.发现的模式[M].北京:中国国际广播出版社,1988..
  • 3AUSTIN J L.Other Minds[M]∥URMSON J O,WARNOCK G J.Philosophical Papers.Oxford:Oxford University Press,1979.
  • 4STINE G.Skepticism,Relevant Alternatives,and Deductive Closure[M]∥DEROSE K,WARFIELD T A.Skepticism:A Contemporary Reader.Oxford:Oxford University Press,1999.
  • 5DEROSE K.Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions[J].Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,1992(52):913-929.
  • 6STROUD B.The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1984,第40页.
  • 7COHEN S.Contextualist Solutions to Epistemological Problems:Scepticism,Gettier,and the Lottery[J].Australasian Journal of Philosophy,1998(76):289-306.
  • 8DRETSKE F.Epistemic Operators[M]∥DEROSE K,WARFIELD T A.Skepticism:A Contemporary Reader.Oxford:Oxford University Press,1999.
  • 9WILLIAMS M.Scepticism[M].Aldershot:Dartmouth Publishing House,1993.
  • 10UNGER P.Philosophical Relativity[M]∥DEROSE K,WARFIELD T A.Skepticism:A Contemporary Reader.Oxford:Oxford University Press,1999,第10-16页.

共引文献1

同被引文献27

  • 1程炼.刘易斯与怀疑论[J].云南大学学报(社会科学版),2004,3(6):8-13. 被引量:1
  • 2Brendel E, Jager C. Contextualist Approaches to Episte- mology: Problems and Prospects [ J ]. ErKenntnis, 2004 (61).
  • 3Rysiew P. Epistemic Contextualism [ J ]. The Stanford En-cyclopedia of Philosophy ,2011 (3).
  • 4Baumann P. The Case for Contextualism [ J ]. Analysis, 2010(70).
  • 5Okasha S. Multi-Level Selection, Covariance and Contextu- al Analysis [ J ]. British Journal for the Philosophy of Sci- ence,2004(55).
  • 6Aloni M, Egre P, de Jager T. Knowing whether A or B [J]. Synthese, 2009(10).
  • 7Baumann P. Contextualism and the Factivity Problem [ J ]. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,2008( 3 ).
  • 8Brueckner A, Buford C T. Contextualism, SSI and the fac- tivity problem [ J]. Analysi,2009(69).
  • 9Baumann P. Factivity and contextualism [ J ]. Analysis 2010(70).
  • 10Brueckner A, Buford C T. Reply to Baumann on factivity and contextualism [ J ]. Analysis, 2010 (70).

引证文献6

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部