期刊文献+

基于可靠度和一致强度的冲突证据组合算法 被引量:3

A conflicting evidence combination algorithm based on reliability and coherence intensity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 考虑到利用无线传感器网络对天然气管道进行泄漏监控时,不同传感器节点的诊断结果之间会发生冲突,致使直接利用Dempster-Shafer(D-S)组合规则或其修正组合规则进行冲突证据组合的方法难以让汇聚节点做出正确决策,为此提出了一种基于可靠度和一致强度的冲突证据组合算法——CECARCI。该算法首先利用各监测节点的可靠度对证据集进行预处理,减小不可靠证据对组合结果的影响,然后通过对所有证据进行整体分析,引入了证据一致强度和基元支持度,调整证据组合时的次序,并以合理的权重来分配证据间的冲突。算例实验结果表明,相比于D-S组合法则、Yager组合法则和Murphy组合法则,CECARCI算法可获得收敛性更好的组合结果。 Considering that when wireless sensor networks are applied to security monitoring for gas pipelines, the diagnosis results from different sensor nodes may seriously conflict, so it is difficult for the sink node to make correct decisions using the Dempster-Shafer (D-S) Combination rule or its modified combination rules, this paper proposes a new conflicting evidence combination algorithm based on reliability and coherence intensity (CECARCI). Firstly, the algorithm preproeesses the evidence set according to nodes' reliability in order to decrease the effect of unreliable evidences on the fusion result, and then analyzes all the evidences, and obtains the sequence of combination according to the coherence intensity of evidence. Additionally, the coherence intensity and the support degree of base element are used to manage the conflict. The numerical example shows that the CECARCI can obtain more reasonable results with good convergence compared with D- S, Yager or Murphy combination rules.
出处 《高技术通讯》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第7期730-734,共5页 Chinese High Technology Letters
基金 863计划(2006AA01Z222) 北京市教育委员会共建项目资助。
关键词 证据理论 冲突证据 一致强度 可靠度 theory of evidence, conflicting evidence, coherence intensity, reliability
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献8

  • 1杨风暴.证据冲突的衡量方法研究[J].华北工学院学报,2005,26(1):58-60. 被引量:12
  • 2印鉴 刘星成 汤庸.专家系统原理与编程[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2000..
  • 3Dempster A P.Upper and lower probabilities induced by a Multivalued mapping[J].Annual Mach Statist,1967; 38 (4):325~339
  • 4Shafer G.A Mathematical Theory of Evidence[M].Princeton:University Press,1976
  • 5Yang J B,Singh M G.An evidential reasoning approach for Multiple-attributed decision making with uncertainty[J].IEEE Transaction on System,Man and Gybernetics,1994; 24 (1):1~18
  • 6Drukopoulos E,Hsia YT,Smets P.Transferable belief model for decision making in the evaluation based systems[J].IEEE Trans on System,Man and Cybernetics,1996; 26 (1):698~712
  • 7Yager R R.On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rules[J].IEEE Trans on System,1989 ;41 (2):93~137
  • 8邓勇,施文康.一种改进的证据推理组合规则[J].上海交通大学学报,2003,37(8):1275-1278. 被引量:82

共引文献3

同被引文献30

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部