汉英“跑+名/run+n.”搭配的对比研究

A Contrast Study on the Collocation of "Pao+Ming" vs. "Run+N."

本文基于一定数量的实际语料,从分析语义成分入手,对比分析汉英"跑+名/run+n."搭配的异同。研究发现:无论是基本义还是隐喻义用法,"跑+名/run+n."搭配差异都很明显,异远大于同。"跑+名"的语义组合是"受事/承受对象、结果、时间、方式和处所";run+n.的语义组合没有"方式",只有run复合体才接处所名词,其他跟汉语有相同的语义成分。在分析搭配差异原因的同时,本文还指出探讨英汉词汇搭配差异对英语教学有启示作用。

Based on a certain amount of Chinese and English corpora and through the semantic analysis, this paper makes a comparative and contrastive study on collocation differences and similarities between ＂Pao ＋ Ming＂ and＂run ＋ n. ＂ and also reaches some ideas： whether on the primary or metaphorical meanings, the collocation differences between the above two are apparent and the differences are far greater than the similarities. The semantic collocation of ＂Pao ＋ Ming＂is Object, Result, Time, Manner and Location; ＂run ＋ n. ＂has much the same semantic collocation as ＂Pao ＋ Ming＂ except Manner and Location, for no Manner exists in ＂run＂and Only verb complex of ＂run＂ can be followed by Location nouns. Also in this paper some reasons are listed for the collocation differences and attention is called to these differences between Chinese and English in English teaching.