“争议浩然”:文学批评的语言学“缺席”

Controversies on Hao Ran and His Works:a Linguistic Absence in Literary Criticism

浩然已走完了他的人生途程,但是他和他的《金光大道》所引起的争议和话题并未完结,综观现有的相关研究,不难发现,与语言有关的问题在各阶段的争议中都未被涉及。本文主要通过语言和意识形态、语言和文学价值、作家的个人修辞行为与语言文化共通感三个关系,思考现有研究的局限和存在的问题。

Although Hao Ran＇ s life journey has come to an end, controversies on him and his novel Jin Guang Da Dao have not ended yet. In light of relevant studies on Hao Ran in the latest 30 years in China, it is not difficult to find that there exists a phenomenon of ＂ lingustic absence. ＂ By examining the relationship between tanguange and ideology, languange and literary value, and the author＇ s personal rhetoric and the lingual - cultural commonality, this paper aims at revealing the limitations and problems of criticisms on Hao Ran.