“激进”与“眷顾”的思想纠结——石评梅“出走”意义再辨析

Idealistic Tanglement of "Radicalization" and "Favor"——Differentiating and Analyzing The Meaning of Shipingmei's "to Flee" Again

石评梅的离家"出走",不仅仅是其在"五四"思想和社会解放引领下被动式的个人选择,而更多地是基于要逃离俗常生活的内在叛逆愿望之驱使。从当时时代和知识青年关系看,石评梅离晋赴京应该具有空间性与文化性的双重指向。我们与其把它当作一种行为姿态,倒不如把它视为一种精神追求更为恰当。但同时我们也应看到,正因为石评梅与传统以及传统主导的俗常生活有割不断的联系,她又不可能真正"逃离俗常",这是石评梅思想复杂性和精神悲剧性的真正由来。

Shipingmei＇s ＂to Flee＂ was not only passive personal choice by the leading of the ideology of the May 4th Movement and social liberation, but also was impelled by intrinsic treasonous wish of fleeing common life. Shipingmei＇s behavior of leaving Shanxi to Beijing should have double point of extensity and cultural traits from the relation of epoch of that time and educated youth. It＇s better regard as a kind of behavioral stances than as a kind of spirited pursuit. But at the same time we can see true cause of ideational complexity and spiritual tragic of Shipingmei＇s thought. Shipingmei cannot really ＂flee common life＂ because of endless relation of Shipingmei and tradition as well as common life led by tradition.