摘要
目的:比较2%一般琼脂糖凝胶、2%Metaphor琼脂糖凝胶和10%非变性聚丙烯酰胺凝胶分析分枝杆菌标准株酶切片段的准确性。方法:采用通用引物对分枝杆菌hsp65基因序列进行PCR扩增,限制性内切酶BstE Ⅱ和Hae Ⅲ对扩增产物进行消化,分别采用2%一般琼脂糖凝胶、2%Metaphor琼脂糖凝胶和10%非变性聚丙烯酰胺凝胶比较分枝杆菌标准株酶切片段的准确性。结果:与标准酶切图谱相比,所有10%非变性聚丙烯酰胺凝胶酶切片段差异均在15 bp以内,而2%Metaphor琼脂糖凝胶和2%一般琼脂糖凝胶则超过15 bp,甚至少数条带不能显示。结论:三种方法中以PCR-RFLP非变性聚丙烯酰胺凝胶法的准确性较高。
Objective: To compare the accuracy of the fi'agment sizes of PCR- RFLP using 2% agarose gel, 2% Metaphor agarose gel and 10% polyacrylamide gel. Methods: PCR was performed targeting the common hsp65 gene in mycobacteria. Two restriction enzymes, BstE Ⅱ and Hae Ⅲ, were used to digest the PCR products. The abovementioned three gels were used to compare the accuracy of the fragment sizes. Results: Compared with standard restriction patterns, all the fragments generated by digestion on 10% polyacrylamide gel had a size difference by less than ± 15 bp, 2% Metaphor agarose gel and 2% agarose gel by more than ± 15 bp, and few even no bands. Conclusion: 10% polyaerylamJde gel yields more precise estimates of fragment sizes.
出处
《中国麻风皮肤病杂志》
2009年第7期496-499,共4页
China Journal of Leprosy and Skin Diseases